provorov was listed at 201 lbs his draft year, and is either 2 or 3" shorter than juolevi depending on which site you check. that does seem like a different physical type to me. i'd consider an 18 year old over 200 lbs to be an early maturer.
https://www.defendingbigd.com/2015/...aft-ivan-provorov-profile-and-scouting-report
Bob Mckenzie's 2015 and 2016 final draft rankings:
http://www.tsn.ca/mcdavid-tops-mckenzie-s-final-draft-ranking-1.300634
http://www.tsn.ca/matthews-goes-wire-to-wire-as-tsn-s-top-prospect-1.511597
Provorov - 6'0 193lbs
Juolevi - 6'2 188lbs
I highly doubt Provorov is the exact weight today (201 per Eliteprospects) that he was two years earlier so I'd take that DefendingBigD number with some salt. Using Mackenzie as a single consolidated source it sounds like a difference of 2 inches and 5 lbs. If that negates the comparison then I'll refer you to my earlier comment that you are being FAR too selective in what you consider a comparable. 2 inches and 5 pounds should not be a critical factor in deciding whether two prospects are comparable or not. It's just an absurd way to duck out of setting a reasonably high bar for Juoelvi.
Edit: One interesting thing out of the DBD article. Mentioned that Provorov played for a powerhouse Brandon team in 2014-15, so I looked up their team GF (340 goals). In 2015-16 that dropped to "just" 316 goals or a decline of 24 goals. Despite this, Provorov still managed to increase his PPG from 1.02 to 1.18. Meanwhile the London Knights suffer a similar drop from 319 to 289 (30 goals) and this is considered a satisfactory explanation (for some) as to why Juolevi didn't increase his PPG.
Last edited: