Ogopogo*
Guest
Because you know me in one brief exchange.
I will say this now that theres an intermission break.
All we heard 1.5yrs ago and again this off season is that Dallas Eakins is a great coach because he adhers to advanced stats. Folowed by Eakins being a complete disaster and total silence about if from advanced stats crowd. So in other words somebody is great and astute because they quote advanced stats and become a hero coach in the community. Followed by convenient dissociation when advanced stats head coach completely flounders. Now I'm not saying that this proves anything specifically about the stats themselves. But it says a ton about how they are typically argued..
next we here in the offseason that the numerous additions the oilers made to the roster were good to very good corsi players. That the team is making decisions on the basis of Dellow advice (people made this inference repeatedly) followed by certain players being crash and burn disasters followed by. "these were never really players recommended by the advanced stats community anyway. Oh. That's. Convenient.
Now you come in here for the first time saying which players are, and aren't advocated by advanced stats (which uses moving goal posts all the time) and I'm supposed to take it seriously.
Unfortunately myself, and anybody here has seen information twisted so many ways by the advanced stats acolytes. Its pretty much noise. Given that theres now several advanced stats barometers what does it even mean when you state. "This is not really an advanced stats player" because that's a grossly convenient generalization that means nothing other than posthoc retroanalysis.
The Oilers are the best example of why so-called "advanced stats" are complete drivel. 12 players in the ice make the stat NOT an individual. Assigning a Corsi number to an individual player and using that to make personnel decisions at the NHL-level is the an egregious mis-use of tier 1 fans' ticket money and tier 2 fans' TV package dollars.
I have no doubt that Dellow influenced management to pick up "good Corsi" guys like Purcell, Pouliot and Nikitin. The reality is: those guys suck. Their Corsi numbers were inflated by being on good teams, riding on the coat-tails of good players, who actually impacted those numbers. Corsi is a team stat, gathering crappy players from good teams because of a high Corsi is complete stupidity. Dellow should have been fired along with Eakins for his garbage advice. MacT should be canned for bringing them both on board and believing the smoke & mirrors.
Corsi is a team stat, complete garbage for evaluating individuals - no matter how blue in the face Dellow and his fellow Corsi Cult members get, trying to convince you otherwise.
Thanks MacT for beginning the end of this madness. I love good analytics, but hate garbage like Corsi and Fenwick. So many just eat this crap up because they don't know any better - they are indoctrinated into the cult. Corsi is just a Fancy way to count shots at goal, NOT possession. Corsi cultists have no idea what possession means.
If Eakins was telling our team that a good Corsi is the key to success because PDO (shooting + save %) is just luck, no wonder we sucked so mightily with him as coach.
"Advanced" stats, indeed.
Last edited by a moderator: