I'm not sure I'd include this one...if you're referring to picking Hall and Yakupov 1st overall over Seguin and Murray, they went with the consensus BPA both times which is hardly unique for teams to do, especially when they're drafting 1st overall. It just so happened that in the 2010 and 2012 drafts the BPA happened to be a winger. That's just the way it goes sometimes.
Or are you referring to something else?
Eberle, MPS, Hall, Pitlick Yak, and a few others. they drafted wingers with their top picks something like 6 straight times, or at least twice as often as the other positions, and considering wing is the least impactful and most easily fillable position.
Should they be beating someone else's drum?
I'm confused.
how 'bout doing what the good teams do, like, say actually conducting interviews to fill the most important jobs in the organization. Hiring people with a proven track record, from winning organizations. this is an organization with the worst 5 year record in league history, yet continues to operate in the same manner that brought about this dubious distinction. it boggles the mind.
to be fair, there are signs that they are seeing the light. For example, they are, perhaps, the only team that thinks (thought) you can win with a collection of dangling, toe-dragging nice boys. This seems to be changing, finally.
there are some examples that can be considered a good thing. like, as has been posted, utilizing advanced stats.
but, overall, the Oiler way is the wrong way. How bout hiring friends that you are too close with to let go, later. Well, they are probably not alone on this one, but they have taken it to a level that is in complete contradiction with basic business principles.
you can't have their record and conclude you are doing things the right way. Or, at least, you shouldn't. The Oilers prove you can.