Couch Rooted
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2019
- 16
- 9
My proposal would be an Oilers 5th Round pick (2024) to the Sharks for Ryan Carpenter. Sharks would retain 1/3 of salary.
My proposal would be an Oilers 5th Round pick (2024) to the Sharks for Ryan Carpenter. Sharks would retain 1/3 of salary.
Better to just send a contract back and up the pick to a 4th or maybe a 3rd depending on who we are sending back. Ryan , Janmark , Brown or GagnerMy proposal would be an Oilers 5th Round pick (2024) to the Sharks for Ryan Carpenter. Sharks would retain 1/3 of salary.
Why would we up the pick to send back a buyable contract? Never mind that the ones you mentioned are good depth for a playoff run.Better to just send a contract back and up the pick to a 4th or maybe a 3rd depending on who we are sending back. Ryan , Janmark , Brown or Gagner
Good point.Sharks aren't using their last retention slot for that
No thanks, rather just keep Carpenter.
He’d have to be retained 50% to have any value. He’d be like a very last on the list priority addition for the Oilers. So like if we have used all our cap for priority upgrades maybe we squeeze him in a depth piece.He has been killing penalties, his faceoff % is a bit low. He seems to be a gritty team player, something that could compliment Oilers 4th line.If he can win faceoffs and can kill penalties sure
He has a small NHL sample size, but I think as a rotate in during this long stretch the Oilers will need to add another forward for their durability.Right shot centre, intriguing he’s only -1 on the Sharks.
I was looking at ways the Oilers could add a forward without taking away. This appeared to be the only scenario.Why would the sharks use a retention slot on a guy making league minimum?
I’m don’t know the rules on retention. It just appeared to be an option to add a bottom six player while the Oilers are going through a stretch that durability may be an issue.He makes league minimum, so no retention, but yeah sure I'd take a 5th for him. Guy is a solid PKer but is probably below replacement level at evens as a 4C...
That makes no sense. Any one of those could be waived and buried at full cap hit. Unless another team is taking Browns bonus there is no point to burying those players.Better to just send a contract back and up the pick to a 4th or maybe a 3rd depending on who we are sending back. Ryan , Janmark , Brown or Gagner
Doesnt Browns bonus stay with edmonton regardlessThat makes no sense. Any one of those could be waived and buried at full cap hit. Unless another team is taking Browns bonus there is no point to burying those players.
I didn’t see anything about him being on waivers. As far as I’m aware he’s still up with the Sharks.Carpenter clears waivers
I didn’t see anything about him being on waivers. As far as I’m aware he’s still up with the Sharks.
Ok well I guess I’ll have to keep up the search from my armchair.He is but he’s cleared before
Rangers and Sharks
He’s not that good anymore
Probably, but there has been some conflicting reports from the media on it. There was one report that basically said it depends on the fine print in the contract about when the bonus is paid - if it was when he met the conditions it belongs to Edmonton. If it's at the end of the season, it could go to another team. But again, that was one article and I have no idea how legit it was.Doesnt Browns bonus stay with edmonton regardless