Guys its a 5000 word article, I have no editor.. give me a break. For the 4 or 5 mistakes in the article there's also probably 20 solid points that many people would otherwise have know clue about. Would you prefer to read the bull that sportsnet puts out, were their writers state the fact they don't watch games. I'm a former player and current scout, I'm not a professional writer with a journalism degree I do this to get more exposure to the OHL game and for fans that dig and dig for info an get find it.
In all seriousness if you want to knit pick, we need an editor, volunteer. I'm completely genuine in asking that, I don't have time to proof read six articles a day on top of a day job and scouting.
First, I don't think anyone is attacking you at all. I think each person on here that contributes to the board by way of posting is adding insight. In many cases that insight adds to the overall knowledge base of the fans that view that portion of the forum. In this case, it is the Ontario Hockey League.
I like reading power rankings and such because it allows me an opportunity to gain insight on other teams that I simply don't have a means of accessing otherwise.
I am a 67's fan. As such, I have access to additional information afforded to me in this marketplace through local media and discussions with local fans.
When I suggested the 67's had won 2 of 3 on the road instead of your reported 1 of 2 on the road, it was not meant as an insult. I was correcting as a means to inform other fans of the stat error. I also added that the 67's had won 6 of their last 7 as a means of adding to the discussion. Maybe it adds insight that could be reflected in future rankings. Who knows.
Personally, I don't need nor want someone calling me out on a forum for adding to discussion especially if it is someone defending their work.
If your aim is to post the power rankings with no additional discussion which could potentially include pointing out major statistical errors like the record for a week (which normally wouldn't be a major error but since this is a weekly power rankings, it is probably one of the most important stats for the week), then approach the moderator of the site and ask to have it locked for no discussion.
If you post your work on a site like this, you need to expect there are people out there that may not only correct your work but also disagree with your opinions and assessments, not to mention your rankings.
I appreciate the work people like you do to add to the knowledge base of fans like me. In the beginning stages of Hockey's Future, I wrote a few articles and also prepared an NHL Draft Rankings and profiles for the OHL eligible players (1999). I know how much work that can be so I appreciate the efforts.