Yup, it's pretty much given that he'll jump into Q's lineup limbo as a rookie, which I presume means that he'll get a decent amount of sheltered minutes. I just think that the forward corps needs veteran scoring prowess, maybe they'll send Saarela somewhere along with Yandle and the Cats sign Granlund via FA. However, I don't think that it's a gigantic gamble by going into the 20-21 campaign with Barkov, Borg, Saarela and Wallmark in the middle.
What's your thoughts on that Lucic for Matheson deal/proposal? To bring in a guy that will punch holes in peoples face for touching Tippett and Densienko?
So it seems you like Acciari on the wing if that's the C depth? I think Saarela may have the advantage as 2C because he has more AHL experience but Borg does have the slight edge in NHL experience but didn't overly impress.
Wish we knew more about the Borg situation, has the feeling of him taking a stage left exit, hopefully not as I still believe he can be salvaged at wing if it doesnt work out at C.
Maybe inquire about Strome in NYR? Depending on his arbitration/salary demands?
I'd much rather have a stop-gap at 2C whether it's Granlund, Haula or another cheaper vet who can fill in while we see what we have in Borg/Saraala/Wallmark
One thing I do like about Saarela is he is versatile and played both wing and C in Springfield. Both in bottom and top 6.
Also he seemed to catch some attention about being the last player on the ice during the camp before play-ins, working on his shot and doing some drills, think thats Barkov rubbing off on him. Shows he is willing to put the work in but I agree, would be okay if we somehow acquire a vet on an expiring deal like Haula this year.