NightmanCometh
Registered User
Last season the Bruins ranked third place in goals for and second place in goals allowed. The team was very effective in both ends of the ice, and I doubt that level of excellence will be repeated this season.
In the offseason, we lost a big part of our offense with Iginila and a big part of our defense with Boychuck. Our only real acquisition to counter these losses came in the form of 2 draft picks. Clearly these will have no impact on the Bruins this season.
Taking into account our draft picks, depth at center, and proven talent in the AHL we likely have the ability to acquire a top 4 D or a quality wing. I think it's realistic to say we could only afford a quality D or a quality guy on offense. Which do we need more?
I'm tempted to say we need more point production out of our top line, but we're supposed to be a defensive powerhouse and right now we don't even have a full top 4.
Agh, with Manchuck this wasn't an issue. What a frustrating predicament.
In the offseason, we lost a big part of our offense with Iginila and a big part of our defense with Boychuck. Our only real acquisition to counter these losses came in the form of 2 draft picks. Clearly these will have no impact on the Bruins this season.
Taking into account our draft picks, depth at center, and proven talent in the AHL we likely have the ability to acquire a top 4 D or a quality wing. I think it's realistic to say we could only afford a quality D or a quality guy on offense. Which do we need more?
I'm tempted to say we need more point production out of our top line, but we're supposed to be a defensive powerhouse and right now we don't even have a full top 4.
Agh, with Manchuck this wasn't an issue. What a frustrating predicament.