Reading up on Nick Mickoski I see that he played here in Newfoundland for a while so that's cool to see. Looking at Mickoski I see that he had solid numbers in the minors, in the NHL he was a half a point a game player, not what you want on your 1st line especially going against 2 of the more prolific scorers in this league in Nedved and Straka.
It's all about relativity. He was 11th, 13th, 13th, 13th in goals. Compare this to Nedved who was 12th, 21st, 28th, 30th in goals.
Patrik Sundstrom was a guy I've always liked. Still I have to question why he retired at age 30 when he was still a solid contributor to the Devils team.
30 wasn't an uncommon retirement age in 1990; and he still played, but in the Swedish 2nd league, where he was working on getting them back to the Elitserien.
Mark Johnson, a 2-time 30 goal scorer in the NHL was a renowned member of Team USA that won gold at the 1980 Olympics.
He did it at a time when 30 goals meant nothing. In comparsion, when Burrows hit 35 in 2010, he was 10th in the league. When Johnson did it in 84, he was 40th.
Terry Crisp is good if you wish to go for defense. He is a shut down guy but the question is if he can keep up with guys like Nedved and Straka over the course of a seres?
If speedy players weren't a problem when Crisp played, they won't be now.
Pentii Lund is somewhat of a pioneer, perhaps 1 of the first international-born players to win a NHL award. Other than that he seemed to be an average NHLer.
An average NHler capable of shutting down Maurice Richard
Alex Burrows is going to be good in the NHL but picking him in the AAA draft is a mistake, there where better options available including a couple of undrafted names myself and Dave thought about picking.
Burrows isn't great, but he did at least have a top-10 finish in goals. Additionally, Burrows kills penalties well and led the league in short handed goals. He's now a spare forward, so it will have little impact on the series.
Now to The Defense
Our first defensive pairing consists of Anders Eldebrink and Keith Brown.
Eldebrink is one of the better offensive defenseman in this draft. A former player of the year in Sweden is a good find for our defense.
Keith Brown is a fellow Newfoundlander that Dave mentioned to me. Brown may be the best player to come out of this province so picking him was heartfelt for me. Still Brown was a good player and according to
Legends of Hockey and I quote: Brown was a solid player in all phases of the game and a die-hard competitor.
For our opponents:
Nikolai Makarov may be best known as Sergei’s older brother but he was also a solid scorer during his time in Russia, I think he matches up against Eldebrink here but Eldebrink was visibly better.
Al Dewsbury was considered a giant during his time in the NHL. Still that was in the 40’s. My question is how does he match up with guys like Straka, Nedved, Sanderson and Cassels?
If you were big when you played, you'd be big in the ATD (height relativity). I don't know how he matched up exactly, but I don't see anything that stats he was slow. He was aggressive with a large frame, so he'll probably be pretty physical with them. He's probably better than Brown, and definitely is offensively.
Also, I'd say being 5th amongst defencemen in Soviet League scoring history is a tad more than "solid"
Howie Young looks to me to be a bruiser which is good in a sense but still do you want him costing you a game because of a costly penalty?
It depends with Young; if he's drinking heavily, which would be when he's most likely to do something stupid, we'd probably sit him for Kearns. However, if he's sober (which Toledo would make efforts to ensure he was), he won't be as costly
Goalies:
Ilya Bryzgalov was panned by a few people, my question is why. Bryz was one of the better goalies available, someone often cited as being among the top goalies in the NHL right now (A list which includes all previously drafted players in the ATD, MLD and AAA)
For our opponents:
Bert Lindsay’s G.A.A. concerns me. While he may have been talented, I don’t think his career G.A.A. being so high will help him against a team like ours with so much offensive skill.
Lindsay played on bad teams, hence his GAA is high. Additionally, the GAA looks high now, but in comparison to career GAA of contemporaries, it's not bad.
In the NHA:
1910: Leader 3.4/Lindsay 2nd with 4.5
1911: Had the worst GAA, leader 3.9/Lindsay 6.3
In the PCHA
1912: Leader: 5.1/Lindsay 5.6
1913: Lindsay led with 3.7
1914: Lindsay led with 4.5
1915: Lindsay had a bad season with 6.8 in comparison to the leader's 4.2, but he was still selected to a two game PCHA All-Star team.
An older Lindsay in the NHA wasn't great, but he was 35 in 1915.
Coaching:
Bill Dineen, to me, was 1 of the best coaches available here. A coach in the top 3 hockey leagues of all time (NHL, WHA, AHL) and a 4-time winner of their league trophies. Also in his entire coaching career he finished below. 500 3 times which is impressive when you consider he coached for a long time.
Emile Francis is our opponent’s coach, he was a good choice as well but he never won a title at any level as a coach so our team is at a dis advantage there.
Emile Francis is not our coach; Ernie McLean is. He never got a chance at the NHL (quite possibly because of his facial scaring), but he was a tremendous junior coach.