O'Brien Division playoff spot: HC Košice vs. Winnipeg Victorias

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,324
6,500
South Korea
The Ambrose O'Brien Division playoff spot series


HC Košice

coach Tom Johnson

Miroslav Šatan (C) - Jozef Stümpel - Mikael Renberg
Dmitri Khristich - John Cullen - Michael Nylander
Magnus Arvedson - Steve Rucchin (A) - Sami Kapanen
Johnny Sheppard - Earl Ingarfield - Scott Pellerin
Derek King, Jude Drouin

Ľubomír Višňovský - Richard Matvichuk
Bret Hedican - Eric Weinrich
Keith Carney (A) - Norm Maciver
Ed Kea

Daren Puppa
Andy Aitkenhead


vs.


Winnipeg Victorias

coach Brian Sutter

Andrew Brunette (A) - Jim McFadden - Mud Bruneteau
Cory Stillman - Dave Creighton - Glen Murray (A)
Shawn Burr - Bill Clement - Ian Laperierre
Rick Dudley - Daymond Langkow - Gary Leeman
Alf Pike, Glenn Brydson

Eric Brewer (C) - Oleg Tverdovsky
Janne Niinimaa - Robert Picard
Garth Boesch - Joe Reekie
Gord Lane

Jose Theodore
Tim Thomas

 
Last edited:

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,324
6,500
South Korea
2-Game Home & Away Series


150px-HCKosice.png


vs.

220px-WinnipegVictoriasFeb1896.jpg


 
Last edited:

BillyShoe1721

Terriers
Mar 29, 2007
17,252
6
Philadelphia, PA
HC's advantage in terms of forwards overall gives them an advantage over Winnipeg's better top 6 but not nearly as good bottom 6. Difference maker could be in the nets.
 

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,324
6,500
South Korea
How Kosice could win: Have the Rucchin line shadow the McFadden line and have the speedy Hedican and tough Weinrich out there against Murray as often as possible, and have Matvichuk and Carney clear the crease. Offensively, the blueline can use its experience in the postseason, with an impressive :amazed: 115 NHL playoff points between the five rearguards not named Višňovský. The team should score early and often. Don't rely on the perimeter game as the Victorias will get shotblocking from Laperriere and Reekie. Capitalize on turnovers and get all four lines into the action with shorter shifts and depth of scoring.

How Winnipeg could win: Bruneteau has scored multiple goals in three Stanley Cup cup championships, McFadden scored a couple in a lesser role in another cup and their linemate Brunette has had three productive postseasons. This line has to produce. The 2nd line has experience scoring in the playoffs. The 2nd line pivot Creighton led Boston to the 1953 Stanley Cup finals as the Bruins' top scoring center that postseason and he was top-2 in team scoring two other shorter playoff runs as a Ranger so he knows how to step his game up in the playoffs and will have to here. Murray has 40+ playoff points to help the line produce and Stanley Cup playoff hero Stillman can be impossible to check with his unpredictible dipsy doodling in the offensive zone, dishing off passes. Both benched forwards need to inserted into the starting lineup for the postseason. Drouin has gaudy playoff numbers and King led the Isles in assists in the NYI conference finals run in 1993. The defense has to play a simple conservative game except for the second pairing, as Niinimaa famously led the Flyers blueline in scoring in their 1997 Stanley Cup finals run and Picard led the Nordiques with 10 assists in their shorter 1987 playoffs run. The netminder Theodore has a .911 save % in 51 playoff games but has to stand on his head and bail out the team at times as Kosice will get lots of pucks on net.
 

MadArcand

Whaletarded
Dec 19, 2006
5,872
411
Seat of the Empire
HC's advantage in terms of forwards overall gives them an advantage over Winnipeg's better top 6 but not nearly as good bottom 6. Difference maker could be in the nets.
How exactly is Winnipeg's top 6 better?

- Satan is better than Brunette
- McFadden is comparable to Stumpel
- Renberg is at very least equal to Bruneteau, who hasn't done much outside war years
- Khristich and Stillman are largely a wash
- so is Cullen and Creighton
- Murray has a slight edge on Nylander

There's also the matter of defense, where I feel I have a major edge, as Winnipeg's defense has four flaky D-men in Brewer, Tverdovsky, Picard and Niinimaa, and as an unit, doesn't have nearly as much defensive skill.
 

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,324
6,500
South Korea
- Satan is better than Brunette
In the playoffs, certainly.

- Khristich and Stillman are largely a wash
In the playoffs, Stillman has a clear edge with significant scoring in two Stanley Cup championships with two franchises, the later one he was one of the key players.

- Murray has a slight edge on Nylander
Greater once you consider Nylander is playing out of position.

There's also the matter of defense, where I feel I have a major edge, as Winnipeg's defense has four flaky D-men in Brewer, Tverdovsky, Picard and Niinimaa, and as an unit, doesn't have nearly as much defensive skill.
I totally agree on everything except the term "flaky" :laugh: but I did laugh and nod when I read it. "Shaky" or "inconsistent" may be a better term for it.
 

TheDevilMadeMe

Registered User
Aug 28, 2006
52,271
6,982
Brooklyn
Stillman has a playoff edge, but it's just one significant scoring run, not two, as in TB he managed just 7 points in 21 games.

Agreed with this one. Giving Stillman extra credit for the 2004 Cup run is too close to simply Cup counting in my opinion. He was fine in that playoff run - I don't think it hurt him. But I don't know how much it should help him, as he certainly didn't outperform his regular season standards and there were at least 9 players on his team that postseason more important than him (and that's just off the top of my head; there might have been more).

He was excellent in 2006, however.

I laugh and nod when I read it. "Shaky" or "inconsistent" may be a better term for it.

To be fair, I think "flaky" is the perfect term for Tverdovsky. :)
 

seventieslord

Student Of The Game
Mar 16, 2006
36,190
7,333
Regina, SK
Agreed with this one. Giving Stillman extra credit for the 2004 Cup run is too close to simply Cup counting in my opinion. He was fine in that playoff run - I don't think it hurt him. But I don't know how much it should help him, as he certainly didn't outperform his regular season standards and there were at least 9 players on his team that postseason more important than him (and that's just off the top of my head; there might have been more).

He was excellent in 2006, however.



To be fair, I think "flaky" is the perfect term for Tverdovsky. :)

Agree, Stillman is nothing special in the 2004 run, but he was really clutch in 2006.

I never really noticed Winnipeg's defense was flaky, but now that you mention it, yeah... Although Brewer's been a captain for a few years now - is it fair to call him flaky?
 

seventieslord

Student Of The Game
Mar 16, 2006
36,190
7,333
Regina, SK
We can just call him 'worst adjusted +/- defenseman ever' and be done with it.:laugh:

It's bad, but he also gets a ton of minutes. So all it shows is he's not the best defenseman getting a lot of minutes.

Just as there are great defensemen who play a ton of minutes and outperform the other team's best players, there are good defensemen who play a ton of minutes and get outperformed by the opposition's best, but their coaches are still confident they are the best for the job.
 

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,324
6,500
South Korea
HC Kosice wins the road game against Winnipeg Victorias in OT and the home game in regulation to take the final playoff spot in the division.

Three stars of the home & away series:

1. Miroslav Satan, Kosice
2. Mud Bruneteau, Winnipeg
3. Lubomír Visnovsky, Kosice
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad