BVicious
Registered User
- Jun 15, 2012
- 1,774
- 0
If they can find a trading partner do it. He's done with the Flames, and will likely walk at the end of this season regardless. I still think he could end up as at least an NHL caliber backup, but I don't think he is happy with his treatment by the organization at this point (right or wrong) and I don't think he would re-sign even if offered a contract.I actually feel really bad for Irving, he played well the first three games. Wouldn't be surprised if he asks for a trade.
Guys while he didn't play terrible he hasn't exactly been stellar either. Some of those goals against Dallas were beyond pathetic. I'm not sure if we're leaning a little to heavily on the youth goggles here.
I think at best he would have been a backup goalie in the nhl. Anymore and I think we're deluding ourselves. He couldn't hold the starter job in the Ahl I don't see how we realistically expected him to keep it in the NHL.
Say what you want about Taylor or Brust but both of them have done more to deserve a sniff at the NHL than Irving at the moment.
He had his chance and didn't deliver. May as well see what we have with Taylor. He's not too much older than Irving and has spectacular AHL numbers.
Irving is pretty much done as a Flame. A shame, another first round bust confirmed.
Didn't deliver he is 2-1-1
Columbus game - he played okay.
Vancouver game - he played okay, team didn't show up.
Dallas game - he had a rough game, defense didn't show up, offense bailed him out.
St. Louis game - defense was brutal but it was clear he was out of it to start.
So... yeah. Our team needs to show up every night but frankly he needed to be better as well.
What can ya do though.
Detroit - he was good
Comlubus - he was good
Vancouver - he was good team didn't even show up
Minnesota - he was good until the shoot out
Dallas - mostly good bad goal and shaky puck control
St.louis - bad game
So one bad game and he send him down?
I understand some expect him to be Kipper 2.0 but that is ridiculous he played as fine for a young net minder thrown into the starting role.
Whoops, forgot about the Minnesota game. He was good in that one though.
I dunno. Maybe this is simply evaluating Taylor to see how he fares in the NHL. IMO the writing was on the wall when they claimed MacDonald though. It's pretty clear management holds MacDonald and Ramo in higher regard than Irving. I don't like it at all but again, what can ya do. This is hardly surprising to me as a Flames fan.
Whoops, forgot about the Minnesota game. He was good in that one though.
I dunno. Maybe this is simply evaluating Taylor to see how he fares in the NHL. IMO the writing was on the wall when they claimed MacDonald though. It's pretty clear management holds MacDonald and Ramo in higher regard than Irving. I don't like it at all but again, what can ya do. This is hardly surprising to me as a Flames fan.
Irving has been good, but not great. Irving got his chance, now it's time to see what Taylor can do. If Taylor proves to be a better goalie, then goodbye Irving, best of luck to ya.
Just because he's young, doesn't mean he gets special treatment.
Just because he's young, doesn't mean he gets special treatment.
My thoughts too. Why bother claiming Mac, if you're going to call up another goalie 2 days later.No but why claim Macdonald we could have just tried both at the same time.