NO deal because of mistrust

Status
Not open for further replies.

AM

Registered User
Nov 22, 2004
8,481
2,524
Edmonton
I agree entirely...

and the mis trust is there because the players escalated the salaries to the point of ruining the finances of the NHL under the last CBA.

To what tune you ask? Well the players agree they at least make 24% more then they should. Personally, I'd take that to mean that at -24% the players would be making all the profit and the owners none.

http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Hockey/NHL/2005/03/03/948645.html

LOL Mr RW... owners loss... 1.8B.

No Richie rich... thats owners gain ~200 million and change. You see gross income is a little different then profits or losses.
 

ScottyBowman

Registered User
Mar 10, 2003
2,361
0
Detroit
Visit site
AM said:
I agree entirely...

and the mis trust is there because the players escalated the salaries to the point of ruining the finances of the NHL under the last CBA.

To what tune you ask? Well the players agree they at least make 24% more then they should. Personally, I'd take that to mean that at -24% the players would be making all the profit and the owners none.

http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Hockey/NHL/2005/03/03/948645.html

LOL Mr RW... owners loss... 1.8B.

No Richie rich... thats owners gain ~200 million and change. You see gross income is a little different then profits or losses.

Did anyone understand what this guy just said?
 

SENSible1*

Guest
No trust?

Must explain why NHLers are off in Russia playing for highly trustworthy mobsters.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad