So, most of you are likely to be aware of different charts that put players performance in one of 4 quadrants, Good, Bad, Dull and Fun. I am bored, so I decided to take a game by game, monthly look at how his play classified into 6 quadrants. Bad, Bad Dull, Bad Fun, Good, Good Dull, & Good Fun.
The charts I am using can be found at Evolving-Hockey and they measure Zaitsev's on ice xGF/xGA per 60 (at EV)
Here's what I found.
October:
Good- 1
Good Fun- 2
Good Dull- 1
Bad Fun-
Bad Dull- 3
Bad- 5
November:
Good- 3
Good Fun- 2
Good Dull- 4
Bad Fun-
Bad Dull- 2
Bad- 3
December:
Good-
Good Fun- 2
Good Dull- 1
Bad Fun- 1
Bad Dull-
Bad- 2
What do we take away from this information?
Well from a pure analytic point of view, Zaitsev was absolutely awful in October. That was the sort of month where Dubas was probably on his phone looking for a buyer. However, since then, Zaitsev has been fairly respectable. Not elite by any means, however he's settled in to being what he is, a defensive minded 2nd pairing defender, that the majority of games will have a positive impact when he's on the ice. It's actually pretty staggering the affect the month of October has on his overall analytic line.
Now, this is from a xGF vs xGA point of view, so it doesn't necessarily tell the entire story, but if I had to pick a stat to use on a game to game basis, this is probably it. Something to consider is that Nikita Zaitsev starts in the offensive zone the least and defensive zone the most among our regular d-men. So his xGF/xGA would be lower than others due to that, so it's easier for him to have a "bad" game then someone like, Travis Dermott, who starts in the offensive zone quiet a bit.
The charts I am using can be found at Evolving-Hockey and they measure Zaitsev's on ice xGF/xGA per 60 (at EV)
Here's what I found.
October:
Good- 1
Good Fun- 2
Good Dull- 1
Bad Fun-
Bad Dull- 3
Bad- 5
November:
Good- 3
Good Fun- 2
Good Dull- 4
Bad Fun-
Bad Dull- 2
Bad- 3
December:
Good-
Good Fun- 2
Good Dull- 1
Bad Fun- 1
Bad Dull-
Bad- 2
What do we take away from this information?
Well from a pure analytic point of view, Zaitsev was absolutely awful in October. That was the sort of month where Dubas was probably on his phone looking for a buyer. However, since then, Zaitsev has been fairly respectable. Not elite by any means, however he's settled in to being what he is, a defensive minded 2nd pairing defender, that the majority of games will have a positive impact when he's on the ice. It's actually pretty staggering the affect the month of October has on his overall analytic line.
Now, this is from a xGF vs xGA point of view, so it doesn't necessarily tell the entire story, but if I had to pick a stat to use on a game to game basis, this is probably it. Something to consider is that Nikita Zaitsev starts in the offensive zone the least and defensive zone the most among our regular d-men. So his xGF/xGA would be lower than others due to that, so it's easier for him to have a "bad" game then someone like, Travis Dermott, who starts in the offensive zone quiet a bit.