Did we really get worse? Sutter can do the job Staal did, Sullivan is replaceable and Michalek isn't much of a big loss. And this time around if Fleury ***** himself again at least we have a guy we can turn to now with Vokoun
Sutter is a poor man's Staal, which is still a good player, but he's not Staal. Who did we replace Sullivan with? Lastly, we'll see on Michalek. He was just fine before the coaches started telling him to do god knows what last year, including leaving his skates when he never did before. Yeah, we've got some young guys with potential. Let's see them play 48 games with regular ice time, then I'll feel good about saving the money.
Does he really "do awesome" in the regular season? With the top end talent this team has I find it virtually impossible to believe there aren't 100 coaches that could lead this team to a 4th place finish. That's the least of my complaints with the guy, but 4th or 5th place should be a lock for this team.
I guess we have to wait and see how things start off for us but I really hope the defense isn't as bad cause last year was brutal and it's almost impossible to be that bad again. Young players have a year more off their belt and Martin who rumors were that he was injured is now healthy. See how they perform tomorrow in Philly
Sutter is a poor man's Staal, which is still a good player, but he's not Staal. Who did we replace Sullivan with? Lastly, we'll see on Michalek. He was just fine before the coaches started telling him to do god knows what last year, including leaving his skates when he never did before. Yeah, we've got some young guys with potential. Let's see them play 48 games with regular ice time, then I'll feel good about saving the money.
Agree 100%. And don't forget all those players who had career years are not going to repeat them. But what I really find amazing is that every one simply dismisses the end of last season as an aberration. They forget that it wasn't just the playoffs. The problems started about 8 games earlier. This was a team that was fighting for the division, yet lost twice to the Islanders! This has never been explained and there have been no obvious steps to fix whatever the problem was.
Neal on the pp point? Despres who has looked terrible in the AHL in the top 6? Niskansen top 4? This all looks fairly shakey.
Sutter is a poor man's Staal, which is still a good player, but he's not Staal. Who did we replace Sullivan with? Lastly, we'll see on Michalek. He was just fine before the coaches started telling him to do god knows what last year, including leaving his skates when he never did before. Yeah, we've got some young guys with potential. Let's see them play 48 games with regular ice time, then I'll feel good about saving the money.
Other excerpts, the first being fun as we have that game with the Flyers coming up:
The Tampa Bay Lightning were tabbed as the team that could surprise hockey fans in the East while the Philadelphia Flyers, on the other side of the spectrum, may not meet expectations this year.
"When I look at the Flyers' blue line, that's where I begin to have questions about them," said Ferraro.
(but he later does include them in a group of four elite teams in the east):
McKenzie said he felt everybody in the Eastern Conference playoff picture could surprise people and not make the post-season. He did, however, exclude what he believes are the elite four teams in the east: the Rangers, Penguins, Bruins and Flyers.
no chance we make it out of the east with our defensive scheme.
guarantee you we breakdown again in the first or second rounds. we are considerably worse than last year. terrible forecast from the TSN guys.
The great defense of the Devils that made it to the SCF was that much better?