Out of curiosity, where does Bobrov go in that draft?
And I just saw the link.
My guess (having not participated in that draft so only looking at it superficially) is that his low draft position has to do with team construction.
He was taken close to guys like Gary Dornhoefer, Milan Lucic, Scott Hartnell, Dustin Brown, and the team that finally took Bobrov has him skating on their 4th line. It looks like he didn't quite make the cut as a top-6 scorer, and is a weird fit for a 4th line, so he dropped until the BPA factor was too much to ignore.
And my contention is that the best way to do that isn't to compare Frank Nighbor toe to toe with Pavel Bure and imagine them playing against each other. To me it's a disservice to their contributions, rather than a celebration. Maybe I just need to wrap my head around it differently.
There just isn't much to learn from only comparing Nighbor or Bure to their own peers. That has already been lived through, and we have the results on paper. "Where does Bure rank among 90s-00s wingers?" gives us a lot less to think about than "Where does Bure rank among wingers all-time?".
I think everyone realizes that if you literally time-warped Newsy Lalonde into a game in 2020, he'd probably struggle to even keep up with the play. But that principle works the other way as well. Yeah, "Iron Chest" Tarrington (lol) would be a dismal goalie in 2020. But that doesn't mean Lundqvist would be a superstar in 1920. Imagine playing butterfly with no mask and kneecaps smashing the ice every time he went down. He'd finish the game in the hospital, say "**** this", and embark on a modeling career.
The same applies to skaters. Yes, from a purely objective standpoint Ovechkin moves faster and shoots harder than Nighbor did. Now imagine what it would look like if he played
the full 60 minutes without a break, on Starr skates with a flat-bladed wooden stick and virtually no padding. And can't skate ahead of the puck at any point. And can only receive the puck via drop-pass. Is he still more effective than a guy who actually lived and trained in that environment and was the best player in the world? Maybe... but it's a stretch to think he'd truly dominate the game.
The point of ATD is to give players full credit for existing at the time and place they did, performing at the highest level possible in their lived experience. It's just a thought experiment to give us some basis for making all-time comparisons without getting into the weeds of what Bobby Hull could have done with a composite stick.