- Yahoo Sports
sports.yahoo.com
Hmmmmm.
It wasn't entirely unpopular though, just unprofitable. The franchises still live on in the ELF.NFL Europe was tried once and it folded.
when has the EPL played regular season games in NA? They've been broadcast in NA, I'll grant you that.... MLS is our version of the EPL, SINCE SOME of the MLS Teams partner w/ EPL Teams or have stakes in EPL Teams.... Revolution are not one of them....Pretty much a logistical impossibility that won't make the money they think it will.
The London games are popular because they're not ordinary. Same way EPL games played in North America sell like crazy but MLS struggles at times.
when has the EPL played regular season games in NA? They've been broadcast in NA, I'll grant you that.... MLS is our version of the EPL, SINCE SOME of the MLS Teams partner w/ EPL Teams or have stakes in EPL Teams.... Revolution are not one of them....
Logistics just don’t work when It comes to western teams playing in Europe. No difference from NY to LA vs England to NY.Fans want the real deal. The NFL Europe was like the "Diet Coke" of pro football to fans, the NFL is the real deal.
But the logistics seem difficult to me. The World League of Football of the early 90s was the first and only attempt at a league across multiple continents, and that lasted all of 2 years.
Yeah, if the NFL is seriously considering this, Germany realistically has to have at least two of the teams.
But unless this is coupled with a four team expansion over here, this still seems odd. And neither conference would want to be the one stuck with a division that far away.
The fact that's no Eastern Conference basically bites the NFL in the you know what here. For either NFC or AFC West teams it'd be a pain to know they have to travel there every year. It would also force some interesting realignment (or further N.A. expansion) simply because naturally 9 divisions of 4 doesn't really make a ton of sense.Logistics just don’t work when It comes to western teams playing in Europe. No difference from NY to LA vs England to NY.
Need stadiums that can accommodate the nfl since European football gets priority with the field and they have to keep that in good shape. Tottenheim could remove the grass field and the teams played on turf. Must have done something similar to the London one as they played on turf as well.
Right now how does the nfl get to 36?The fact that's no Eastern Conference basically bites the NFL in the you know what here. For either NFC or AFC West teams it'd be a pain to know they have to travel there every year. It would also force some interesting realignment (or further N.A. expansion) simply because naturally 9 divisions of 4 doesn't really make a ton of sense.
I also think ticket prices would be a problem. It's one thing for say all the Vikings fans in Europe to consider a trip once every couple of years to London to see their team, it's another thing to get a viable season ticket base from the region where the team is located. Germans in particular are not used to paying NFL prices. Basically the league would need to subsidize the crap out of those teams for X years. Same goes for TV rights. They obviously need equal share from the TV money as the U.S. teams even though they will bring a lot less to the table as Euro broadcast deals won't be nearly as lucrative.
Nowadays there's fewer US military presence in Germany though, and more in Poland as well as some other countries further east. That's also a significant shift in the potential fan base given that many of the NFL Europe spectators used to be American.When NFL Europe was a thing in the 90s the German teams carried that thing in terms of attendance
Nowadays there's fewer US military presence in Germany though, and more in Poland as well as some other countries further east. That's also a significant shift in the potential fan base given that many of the NFL Europe spectators used to be American.