dkollidas
Registered User
- Nov 18, 2010
- 3,847
- 541
When we look back at the Vegas expansion Draft, we saw teams like Minnesota, Anaheim, and Columbus that were in potential “jams” because they couldn’t protect certain solid young players.
At the time, most of the fans here proposed deals between those teams in a jam and non-Vegas teams, largely because we’re fans of those teams.
When the expansion Draft took place, that turned out not to be the case. I believe most, if not all of the teams who made moves to protect certain players, made deals specifically with Vegas.
Looking back, it seems this might’ve been a mistake by GM’s around the league. When looking at the eventual Seattle expansion Draft, I think there will be more deals between teams that aren’t Vegas.
Ex. Instead of a team that has too many defensemen making a deal with Seattle, they make a deal with a team that has room for a defenseman but can move a forward, thereby balancing each other’s protection requirements, and limiting Seattle’s ability to select good players.
At the time, most of the fans here proposed deals between those teams in a jam and non-Vegas teams, largely because we’re fans of those teams.
When the expansion Draft took place, that turned out not to be the case. I believe most, if not all of the teams who made moves to protect certain players, made deals specifically with Vegas.
Looking back, it seems this might’ve been a mistake by GM’s around the league. When looking at the eventual Seattle expansion Draft, I think there will be more deals between teams that aren’t Vegas.
Ex. Instead of a team that has too many defensemen making a deal with Seattle, they make a deal with a team that has room for a defenseman but can move a forward, thereby balancing each other’s protection requirements, and limiting Seattle’s ability to select good players.