If the talks had indicated just ONE form of cap, the players should take that. But the NHL has to know that 42 mil is really a false number if revenues dip because they cap individual salaries at 6 million but the crazier one is thr 54% one. It must be the magic number that guarantees under a $2 billion revenue pool, all teams will break even. Just have a hard cap at 50 mil, a floor at 32 mil, and cap salaries by individuals at 8 mil and it's okay in my book. Plus, limits to arbitration, lower UFA age to 29 and it works out decently for both sides. But why is it in this deal that anything that goes well or has gone well under the old CBA is considered a fluke while all the bad things are trends? If both sides don't stop this crap, there will be much less than 2bil to split up.
Post-Game Talk: WCQF GM06 | Canucks defeat Predators | 1-0 (Suter) | SILOVS! SUTER! HEROES!
