Please let the Leafs rush to hire Berube.
Wouldn't that leave us with Sullivan? Even if you think Keefe a better catch, Sullivan would a great get.Sheldon Keefe would be high on my list as well, they outplayed Boston and got goalied. For having pretty garbage defense they played some air tight hockey.
Unfortunately Pittsburgh will get him first.
That would almost be worth it to see the Bleed meltdown, then again he was almost begging for McClellan because he was worried about Green lolWatch us somehow end up with Mclellan lmao
That would almost be worth it to see the Bleed meltdown, then again he was almost begging for McClellan because he was worried about Green lol
It's very easy to dunk on Toronto, they make sure of that, but IMO they've gotten some really rotten luck. A lot of their series they've outplayed the opponents but got torpedoed by goaltending or unpredictable heroics from the other team.
The general philosophy of their team is very similar to the way our team is built, though I think Dubas made some very questionable decisions late in his tenure.
Keefe is a good coach. I wouldn't hate him. I think he'd like an opportunity to play in a more laid back media environment, and it would be a pretty seamless transition in terms of roster fit. He's not my preferred candidate but he makes a bit of sense to me.
It is fascinating that most of the choices while clearly better than what we have are all in some way flawed, there's no real slam dunk at least of the ones that are available now. I can basically make arguments for or against Berube, Woodcroft, Keefe, etc. All I care is whoever we hire has more autonomy, structure and is more willing to have accountability for all.I think Berube with a better lineup could be pretty interesting. His lineups in STL were pretty bland. Also, with Fitz’s input with the coaching staff, I highly doubt our offensive guys would get stifled.
I think Berube with a better lineup could be pretty interesting. His lineups in STL were pretty bland. Also, with Fitz’s input with the coaching staff, I highly doubt our offensive guys would get stifled.
It is fascinating that most of the choices while clearly better than what we have are all in some way flawed, there's no real slam dunk at least of the ones that are available now.
It is fascinating that most of the choices while clearly better than what we have are all in some way flawed, there's no real slam dunk at least of the ones that are available now. I can basically make arguments for or against Berube, Woodcroft, Keefe, etc. All I care is whoever we hire has more autonomy, structure and is more willing to have accountability for all.
He only gets jobs when you need a tank commander, we should be past those days*David Quinn
He only gets jobs when you need a tank commander, we should be past those days
Mine is probably:Of the names assumed to be in play, my hierarchy would be
Sullivan/Keefe
Woodcroft
Berube
Anyone else
With the caveat that I'm firmly in team most coaches won't meaningfully change the results.
Yeah I was joking lol. I do not want Quinn anywhere near this team.