Rimer was on the FAN on deadline day, (or Tuesday, can't remember) and he said that Horton had no plans to retire. Given by what we have seen certain media members print this season that's been debunked, I'm not ready to throw the towel in on Horton's career yet. Regardless of whatever outcome, the CBJ (through their own faults) couldnt afford to have sit in stands anymore, even if he somehow manages to be ready to go at some point next season
If Nathan Horton returns and is anything more than a shell of his former self I would be shocked.
Oh me too.
So, this being the Jackets, prepare to be shocked
You realize he was traded to the Leafs? The joojoo cancels out.
I bet Clarkson isn't here for the all of his contract. He'll be unprotected in an upcoming expansion draft and the new team will have to take him to get to the salary floor.
I'm sorry but players with full NMC have to be protected. Leaf fans were hoping the same thing.
Earlier in the thread it was stated that once it's waived, it's waived. Did we get confirmation on that?
11.8 Individually Negotiated Limitations on Player Movement.
(a) The SPC of any Player who is a Group 3 Unrestricted Free Agent under Article
10.1(a) may contain a no-Trade or a no-move clause. SPCs containing a no-Trade or a no-move
clause may be entered into prior to the time that the Player is a Group 3 Unrestricted Free Agent
so long as the SPC containing the no-Trade or no-move clause extends through and does not
become effective until the time that the Player qualifies for Group 3 Unrestricted Free Agency.
If the Player is Traded or claimed on Waivers prior to the no-Trade or no-move clause taking
effect, the clause does not bind the acquiring Club. An acquiring Club may agree to continue to
be bound by the no-Trade or no-move clause, which agreement shall be evidenced in writing to
the Player, Central Registry and the NHLPA, in accordance with Exhibit 3 hereof.
Per the CBA:
I didn't see anything about after the clause takes effect, only before.
db2011;98982177[B said:]So potentially Clarkson isn't as difficult to trade[/B] since he has been traded, provided Jarmo didn't agree to keep the NTC/NMC clause intact upon acquiring him? If jarmo had the ability to get out from under those restrictions then I sure hope he did it.
So potentially Clarkson isn't as difficult to trade since he has been traded, provided Jarmo didn't agree to keep the NTC/NMC clause intact upon acquiring him? If jarmo had the ability to get out from under those restrictions then I sure hope he did it.
Isnt that how we got Carter? His no whichever clause hadnt kicked in yet.
Per the CBA:
I didn't see anything about after the clause takes effect, only before.
Can't believe we send you guys a perfectly good Clarkson and you break him. Good going guys.