Rongomania
Registered User
And what if he sucks here and we are stuck with his ridiculous contract?
Would be so completely Rongo and at that point you’d just have to laugh and say **** it nothing will ever go right for us.
![laugh :laugh: :laugh:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/laff.gif)
And what if he sucks here and we are stuck with his ridiculous contract?
We've seen what he can do with good linemates.He's been one of our worst players at producing goals and assists.
Wasn't playing on 4th line last season and still gave us **** production.
Even smaller sampleWell somehow with his limited ice time last game he managed to be the only Ranger to be a -3 on the night. So yea, really taking advantage of his ice?
Even smaller than his stat line for the season?Very small sample
Even smaller sample
What what he brought here for? To be the enforcer? At the least he we brought in to match Millers 40 points on a top 9 role..Outside of Kreider and Zibanejad, nobody is scoring. It's not really fair to single out Namestnikov who wasn't really brought here to put up a ton of points.
Tampa is projected to have something like a 12-15% chance of winning the cup. I don't think it would be telling of much of anything if they don't happen to win.
Apparently not, because he hasn't been used in the top 9.What what he brought here for? To be the enforcer? At the least he we brought in to match Millers 40 points on a top 9 role..
then what is Namestnikov or Spooner or Vesey or Hayes or Zibanejad or Kreider?
Sadly other than Howden most of those assets aren't looking too great at the moment.
It might be worth trying again. It's not like we have fierce competition for middle 6 spots on this team.He started in top-6/top-9. Didn't produce which is why he's in the 4th line.
Hajek is 20, just turned pro, and is playing in Hartford.
Lundkvist turned 18 this summer and is the youngest player on his Swedish pro team.
The other pick is still undecided.
Namestnikov is not producing points.
As a whole, I’d say the deal looks promising.
problem is if Namestnikov turns into negative asset and Lundkvist and Hajek don't pan out then it doesn't really look that great. I think drafting Lundkvist was a mistake we should have taken Serron Noel.
Lundkvist just turned 18 and he's playing in one of the top professional leagues against men. It's equivalent of Chytil playing in AHL at the age of 18 last season.
Chytil is soft, but has size for NHL. Lundkvist is soft and has no size, and is is a Defenseman. Not so sure about his NHL future.
Yes because Ryan Ellis is terrible right?Chytil is soft, but has size for NHL. Lundkvist is soft and has no size, and is is a Defenseman. Not so sure about his NHL future.
Yes because Ryan Ellis is terrible right?
Ellis put up 89 points in 57 OHL games and 31 points in 20 playoff games in his draft year, wake me up when Lundkvist does something remarkable or even close to that.
Also show me where Lundkvist can hit like this: