I beg to differ. I went to a Sens-Wings game years ago because he was the only player I cared about on either roster and wanted to see him live.Lemieux and Gretzky. Will say Lemieux first as he was more flashy
Lol at the Datsyuk overrating yet again. Nobody has ever paid to see him play.
Lemieux and Gretzky. Will say Lemieux first as he was more flashy
Lol at the Datsyuk overrating yet again. Nobody has ever paid to see him play.
I have. He was the one guy I wanted to see. I never knew how good he was until I saw him live and I didnt rely on a camera to follow him around when he had the puck.Lemieux and Gretzky. Will say Lemieux first as he was more flashy
Lol at the Datsyuk overrating yet again. Nobody has ever paid to see him play.
What is this even supposed to mean?Lol at the Datsyuk overrating yet again. Nobody has ever paid to see him play.
Since it’s not the best player but most exciting, Pavel Bure for me. Man could he fly! He had a few of those moments every game that got you out of your seat.
dont like the term "exciting".... several different ways of interpreting it, and therefore the results will be "whatever".
Gretzky, Lemieux, Crosby.... most skilled/talented offesively, but not so "flashy".
Jagr, Ovie, McDavid.... very skilled/talented offensively, and flashy
Malkin, Lindros, Forsberg.... very skilled/talented offensively, not as flashy
Datsyuk, Kane, Bure.... a tier below the rest offensively, but are most flashy
so whos exciting? I dunno. They ALL are!
Dunno why Bure is ahead of Ovie, though. Ovie was all that Bure was but better, a better playmaker in his prime, and hit a ton more.
It's subjective as OP sais. I liked watching Bure more than Ovie. He was one of the most "exciting" players to watch and he was more aesthetical in his movement than Ovechkin if that makes sense. Better "art" if I may say so. I think both Forsberg and Malkin belongs in the flashy category but again this is subjective. Good list though
This is Lemieux. Best one on one player in the history of the league.