I'll be back in tomorrow for some reviews. Until then, here are a few tables to get you going:
VsX (with pre-NHL, CSSR, USSR and WHA included) for scoring line centers, 7-year total:
Yashin | 552
Lacroix | 533
Ribeiro | 519
Smith | 516
Savard | 514
Unger | 513
Broten | 474
Briere | 473
Jordan | 467
Denneny | 467
Irvin | 464
Oliver | 452
Ridley | 452
Chapman | 450
Krejci | 449
O'Connor | 441
Nilsson | 412
Haynes | 411
The usual caveats for this type of thing applies - it is only based on 7 years and makes no attempt to give extra credit to players with superior longevity, it is regular season only, it makes no distinction between goals and assists, says nothing about all-around play, and it doesn't take linemate help into consideration. Still, it is a good shorthand to give us a starting point to sorting out this class of players, many of whom have never had the opportunity to be compared to eachother.
There are a few gaps here that seem to define these centers. For starters, it appears clear that Yashin is the best producing center here and it appears clear that Lacroix is next. Ribeiro, Smith, Savard and Unger are next (though if you care at all about longevity, consistency, toughness, linemates and goals, Unger should be considered a good deal better than those three).
From Broten to O'Connor we have the guys who pretty much all blend into one group, though the difference from the top to the bottom there is not insignificant. From that group, Ridley really stands out as having the best all-around game, with Broten, Oliver and Chapman pretty good as well.
Oliver has been getting high praise and I'm not sure it's quite warranted in this role. Yes he's always been an ATD staple, and I understand the temptation to call him elite at this level because of that. He looked great as a 4th liner in the ATD thanks to his all-around game, passable as a 3rd liner too. But on a scoring line where offense is the most important, it's not as clear cut. He's good, not great.
Nilsson and Haynes stand out as poor for this role. They're both just so far behind the next name up on this list, and don't really have anything else to bridge that gap - neither has any significant intangibles, neither has great longevity (Haynes' is poor), both quite assist-biased (especially Haynes), Haynes' playoffs are poor and Nilsson had Bobby Hull for a linemate.
Here is the same table for scoring line wingers:
Shalimov | 506
Wiseman | 496
Cloutier | 490
Vanek | 481
Bellows | 478
Gagnon | 475
Sullivan | 474
Tardif | 463
Goldsworthy | 463
Sandstrom | 463
Kozlov | 461
Cooper | 456
Cain | 456
Kamensky | 455
Boudrias | 454
Thomas | 450
Hedberg | 442
Courtnall | 432
Lala | 430
Vickers | 410
Henderson | 409
Dornhoefer | 407
Hartnell | 404
Anderson | 394
Hebenton | 392
McDonald | 377
Schmautz | 376
Gallant | 366
Loob | 365
Jirik | 359
Lonsberry | 350
Crowder | 348
Cotton | 346
Wilson | 332
Labine | 330
Bonin | 314
In this particular case, only one gap really shows up, and that's the one from Lala to Vickers. You could call this the "glue guy line". Every guy above it is clearly cut out to be conunted on to score on an MLD scoring line, and every guy below it
should be a guy who makes an impact in ways other than scoring, otherwise they're not contributing to an MLD scoring line. In this case, the only "offender" appears to be Loob, though the intangibles possessed by a few names are less strong than others.
On the other hand, players with Lala-level upside or better, who also provide glue guy abilities, look really good here. I'm looking at Andre Boudrias first, and to a lesser extent, Bellows, Tardif, Goldsworthy, Sandstrom, and Thomas.
On the bottom half, there are two smaller gaps. One separates Hebenton and McDonald. One might call that the line between the more and the less talented glue guys - though, this is not a major gap. Towards the bottom, Wilson, Labine and Bonin's scoring indicates they probably would be better suited to bottom line duty here - particularly Bonin.