reping every era in an all-time draft:
1916 or earlier: McNamara
1917-1942: Reise, Sr.
1943-1965: Bodnar
1966-1979: Vickers
1980-1994: Bykov
1995-present: Burns
in 2015: Vlasic
Lately we've gotten so divergent in our judgments on players that I have rarely liked a team of yours - but having reviewed the league this time around, I have you in the top half. There's lots to like here.
Larouche is nothing special as a first line MLD center, but look around at the rest and he holds his own, at least offensively. You got a great bargain on him too, taking him when you did. On the other hand, he could have fell to the AAA and no one would have cared. As far as offensive wingers in this draft go, I think you got the second best one in Kozlov. It's not just his offensive numbers, it's his decent defensive game and his playoff success - both team-wise and individually. Gilmour completes the line well, at least from a skillset perspective. This is as well-built an MLD line as you will find to complement a pure goal-scoring center. It's not loaded with physicality or defense, but it has at least a bit of both, and two good possession guys to serve the center. Gilmour's offensive numbers mean he should in most circumstances be nowhere near an MLD first line, and he is by no means a good first liner but this is a good use for him here.
Bykov was another pretty good value. He's pretty standard fare for an MLD 2nd liner. Khomutov I've never been too thrilled with, but looking around the rest of the league, I like his offensive case a little better than most of these other one-dimensional guys. Gardiner is just way out of his depth here. He's got the offensive numbers of a Mike McPhee level player. Can you imagine putting Mike McPhee on a scoring line anywhere? Me neither. He also does not have a very fleshed out case for intangibles, despite being loosely known as that kind of players. However, regardless of the info on his toughness, defense and leadership one could find, he's just not a scoring line player. He hurts the offensive potential of this line greatly.
Koivu is most likely the best 3rd line center in this draft. I like his two-way potential better than anyone else here. He's not that much ahead of Plekanec, mind you. Those two are the only legitimate two-way threats centering third lines in this draft. Vickers I've never loved as much as you, but he looks ok as a 3rd line scorer here. He's a battler and he played on a very successful even strength line, though he had by far the weakest defensive reputation of the trio. Callahan got a well-deserved jump to an MLD bottom-six. he'd have looked excellent on a 4th line but he's not bad here, either - top half at least. he's one of four who bring a great total package of scoring, defense and toughness/physicality. This is an effective two-way third line that is not deficient in any area.
Sutter's about average for a 4th liner here. There are a few who bring intangibles at his level but can chip in more offense. Hiller is an excellent speedy grinder for a 4th line - probably the best in the draft. Flatley is OK. Standard MLD 4th liner. Nothing really deficient here.
Actually, if you were able to get scoring line glue guys who could help on offense (Gilmour and Gardiner just pale in comparison to Benn, Dornhoefer, Gallant, Dahlen, Warwick, Corson, Lever, Mickoski and Deadmarsh), there would be nothing wrong with this group of forwards at all.
As usual, not a fan of your D. I think it's made up of a number of questionable selections. McNamara is by no means bad, but I think just about everyone else was able to get a more qualified #1. I've got Reise and Cooper as your #2 and 3, and that's not good because they are probably both AAA players when we're talking about an 8-team MLD. Vlasic just isn't there yet when you compare him to other players with longer careers of being more important to their teams. Langlois came out of nowhere, as I said before. Burns just had his 2nd excellent season but he's really a 20 minute, 700 game player on his career; that's not particularly standout, and when you consider his playoff record... yeah.
Normie Smith is an excellent goalie in the MLD with a record that stands up pretty well, as short as his career was. McNeil is at least an average backup and as I mentioned before, was a strong pick when you made it.
Sutter was not only a worthy promotion from the AAA, but looks really good among these coaches. Earlier I singled out 10 head coaches from this year's draft who could drop and I wouldn't care, and Sutter is among five who could easily take their places. Is there enough in the way of intangibles up front? I'm not sold on the fit, but he is a great coach with a proven record of success and respect.
The spares concern me. They're not bad players at all. Himes and Bodnar are among the next-best centers, Crossman among the next-best defensemen and Young a multi-positional star. But your forwards are in a heap of trouble if and when one gets injured. (in reality you never have your best 12 all healthy, there's always one or two of them on the sidelines). Looking at your lineup, I don't see a single forward who is known for playing multiple forward positions. In the spares, two who are exclusively centers, and a rover (so, another center). If you lose a center, yeah you're golden. But what if you lose a winger? what if you lose two? You've got two centers with no wing experience playing wing. That's a recipe for disaster.
I think you made the best choices for captains and assistants - I have nothing to add there.
I see no special teams listed, but your PP defensemen are a major concern. Again. Burns and Reise will do the trick on the first unit, but it's scary to think of who will try to use to man the second unit. It's gonna be ugly back there. Your penalty killing, however, will have no problems, assuming you put the right guys on it. But you do have the right guys.