MLD 2010 James Creighton Cup Consolation Final: Toronto Marlies vs. Texas Brahmas

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,337
6,504
South Korea
James Creighton Cup Consolation Final


Toronto Marlies

coach Bun Cook

Al MacAdam (A) - Marc Savard - Stephane Richer
Red Hamill - Doc Romnes - Art Gagne
Jan Erixon - Brian Rolston - Cecil Blachford (C)
Carl Liscombe - Craig Conroy - Bobby Gould
Jack McIntyre, Bill Flett

Hy Buller - John Van Boxmeer
Gord Fraser - Mario Marois (A)
Warren Godfrey - Dale Tallon
Adrian Aucoin

Evgeni Nabokov
Earl Robertson


vs.


Texas Brahmas

coach Bryan Murray

Jim Riley - Don Smith - Andrei Khomutov
Thomas Vanek - Normie Himes - Art Farrell (C)
Jack Marks - Billy Reay - Mike Keane (A)
Joe Juneau - Terry Ruskowski - Jim Peplinski
Harry Meeking, Billy Harris

Jamie Macoun (A) - Randy Gregg
Alexei Gusarov - Dave Babych
Karel Gut - Doug Young
Roland Stoltz

Ryan Miller
Viktor Zinger

 

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,337
6,504
South Korea
The Brahmas are challenging the Marlies to an exhibition match between the two ousted divisional finalists, a consolation final because, well, we need consoling. The winner of the series gets a Bronze trophy to be donated to a local charity. Toronto management needs to confirm.
 

Dreakmur

Registered User
Mar 25, 2008
18,688
6,963
Orillia, Ontario
The Brahmas are challenging the Marlies to an exhibition match between the two ousted divisional finalists, a consolation final because, well, we need consoling. The winner of the series gets a Bronze trophy to be donated to a local charity. Toronto management needs to confirm.

Sounds like fun :nod:
 

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,337
6,504
South Korea
CAPTAINS - Cecil Blachford vs. Arthur Farrell - Both 2nd round picks in the ATD10-AAA Draft and both promoted to captaincy here in MLD 2010. The two Montreal star right wingers of pre-teen, pre-NHA/PCHA hockey were each multiple Stanley Cup champions. On paper Blachford may look like the better player, but he isn't in the HHOF. He does have two retro-Selkes, awarded by Ultimate Hockey. If we were counting cups he clearly has won more, in 1906, 1908 and again in 1910, all with the Wanderers, the first two as team captain. This gives him a clear leadership edge even if his significance as a player in the history of the game isn't deemed equal to Farrell's. Perhaps the fact that Farrell wrote the first hockey book (he wrote three in all) and died early of TB might have swayed HHOF voters. Farrell wasn't captain of the Shamrocks because Trihey was for their 1899 and 1900 Stanley Cup wins but clearly multiple sources see them as equals in terms of stars of the team, each contributing to even changing the rules of the game, Farrell's 1899 hockey book detailing a manual of how-tos that emphasized combination play, team play. Hence he was clearly a leader with his knowledge and articulation of the game, even if not the captain. He was the equivalent of an alternate captain and the early era position of playing coach. He counselled players not to "lag" with the puck in the middle of the rink (pg. 112 Canada's Royal Winter Game) but instead "It is the duty of every forward toward whose goal the puck has been sent to follow up immediately and quickly in order to place himself in play". He encouraged defensive play by forwards so while he hasn't any retro-Selkes he certainly was responsible in that area and vocal about others doing so. He was a preeminent member of the Fighting Irish, and the team's top scorer in their final Stanley Cup series:

Coverage of the 1900 challenge series in The Gazette bordered on the hysterical. When Winnipeg shocked the Shamrocks and took game 1 by a 4-3 score, the newspaper was devastated, but had to admit the Winnipeg side deserved the win. However, when the Shamrocks stormed back to take the next two games, The Gazette was beside itself. Following game 2, a 3-2 Shamrock victory, it said:

The same exciting features characterizing the first contest were re-enacted. The hockey was sensation in its perfection. Intense excitement prevailed throughout. The final ten minutes, with Shamrock leading by one point and their western opponents straining every resources of nerve and sinew in desperation of pulling down the vital margin, developed the wildest demonstration. The cheering of ten thousand throats was deafening.

When the Shamrocks took the series 2 games to 1 with a 5-4 victory on February 16, The Gazette chortled that “The Stanley Cup Likes Not Western Weather.”

Following the challenge series with Winnipeg, the next challenge could only be a disappointment for hockey fans, as the Halifax Crescents, the champions of the Maritime league, issued one. The Crescents travelled to Montreal in March 1900 for a 2-game series at the Arena. This one wasn’t even close as the Shamrocks romped to 10-2 and 11-0 victories, with Farrell scoring 8 of his team’s 21 goals
http://montrealmosaic.com/article/montreal-shamrocks-hockey-club

So, however much of a team player Farrell was, emphasizing the pass, he certainly knew how to put the rubber into the net. He and Trihey were central in turning the Shamrocks from an average club into multiple champions, both coming to the Shamrocks from the strong hockey team at Collège Ste-Marie, out of which came Loyola College, one of the founding institutions of Concordia University. Interestingly, the Shamrocks had been world champions in lacrosse as determined at matches during the 1893 Chicago World Fair. Farrell is cited as one who emphasized the importance of making hockey less like lacrosse, keeping the puck down, on the ice more, controlling the play better that way.

And let's not forget Lester Patrick's all-time all-star team, as he picked it in 1925: Patrick selected Hugh Lehman in goal, Sprague Cleghorn and Hod Stuart on defence, and up front he chose Tom Phillips, Arthur Farrell and Fred "Cyclone" Taylor. That in itself is significant, though given how the Patricks helped the game evolve, they might have been impressed by Farrell's books more than his on-ice exploits. Still, it is what it is.

So, in terms of leadership and star ability, offensively and defensively, Farrell and Blachford seem like equals. One has to split hairs to find one better than the other. The advantage here, if there is one, is in how each player is used. Blachford is a third liner on the Marlies and as such can be counted on for leadership and defensive play. Farrell is on the Brahmas' second line and more integral to the team's offense, as one cannot imagine him being anything but formative in the design of tactics and style of play. He needn't score a ton, just have his line play a solid passing game. The team's third line is easily equal to any 2nd line in this draft in terms of offensive production, especially in such crucual games as championship play, so that takes pressure off of Farrell's line.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad