Matthews getting a NMC in his 5th year of his RFA contract.
So did Stamkos, Tavares, Crosby, Malkin - everyone. You claim the opposite. You are wrong.
Matthews getting a NMC in his 5th year of his RFA contract.
But looks pretty much like it..
Sure it matters, if he doesn't feel the offer is close to his value, he doesn't have to sign it.
It also matters in that if you do get him signed at something well below what he thinks he is worth than I doubt he is going to be a very happy member of your organization.
Matthews is a better player, but Marner is the better producer. They came into the league at the same time and on the same team, one has 20 points more than the other one.
He can just as easily not re-sign on July 1st when his NMC kicks in and have complete control over his future. If he wants out, he can go. It was dumb to give him that.
What other franchise player got that in his final RFA season? Name them... if you can. Stamkos didn't have that. Neither did your #2C. Who?
So did Stamkos, Tavares, Crosby, Malkin - everyone. You claim the opposite. You are wrong.
What in the world are you talking about. Loads of players have NMC in their RFA deals. Including, Steven Stamkos.
RFA years cannot have NTC or NMC per the CBA, so that would be interesting.
You can sign a deal that covers both RFA and UFA years and have a NMC kick in during the UFA years, but it wouldn't exist for the RFA years.
Matthews getting a NMC in his 5th year of his RFA contract.
RFA years cannot have NTC or NMC per the CBA, so that would be interesting.
You can sign a deal that covers both RFA and UFA years and have a NMC kick in during the UFA years, but it wouldn't exist for the RFA years.
With no offersheets from another team, I think he should have gotten the deal done much sooner. I highly doubt 6.9 mill was anywhere near Duba's initial offer.
Yes, I was more replying to the poster saying that no player who signed an RFA contract similar to Matthews had a NMC in their final year.
Funny looking at Malkins RFA contract with the Pens. Unless it's listed wrong, it shows a full NMC for the entire 5 years.
Evgeni Malkin - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
So? Leafs management knows far more about these two players than any of us on here. They view the one as being worth much, much more than the other over the next 5 years. They could be wrong, but they would not be doing their jobs if they said, oh well, we don't think Marner is worth close to as much as Matthews, but we are going to pay him Matthews money so he doesn't have a case of the sads.
Matthews is a player that teams build their franchise around. Marner is a player who has produced well while playing with a franchise center. If a team wants to OS him they can go right ahead.
Rightly or wrongly, centres get paid 12% more than wingers. If production is equal, that puts Mitch at $10.2.
Only the UFA years are eligible. Now that these super RFA's get UFA money, that's the only big benefit that UFA's have.
So he can sit out just like Nylander did if he doesn't like Dubas' offers. Also you don't think it matters that Marner would be pissed about his contract, in Toronto? How much will the Toronto media make of it every time he has anything but a smile on his face? "Is Mitch mad?" "Does he want out?" Not only would his attitude affect his play, but it could start affecting others if those things become an everyday distraction. Your coach seems to think a bit more of Marner than you do since he puts him on the ice more than your franchise center.
Funny looking at Malkins RFA contract with the Pens. Unless it's listed wrong, it shows a full NMC for the entire 5 years.
Evgeni Malkin - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
I don’t remember that but I remember an islander board making up a purposefully false rumor just to f*** with Eklund since he was taking scoops from that board.I seem to recall about a decade ago that it was revealed that the whole IB persona was fabricated by a group of folks who wanted to see how far they could get by writing fake sports rumours based on trends they saw amongst fanbases.
Surely someone else remembers what I'm referring to, was it indeed IB? This situation certainly fits the bill as the whole Marner offersheet from the Islanders thing started out right here on HFBoards last summer.
I don't really know why people think that younger players should be denied benefits.
The NHL salary landscape is rapidly changing, the NHL middle class is getting squeezed hard.
While these RFA's do deserve the money based on their production, what's left for these UFA's that are slowly seeing their money decrease and being given to the kids? In a sense, the NTC/NMC protection is earned through tenure.
It might change in the future, but that'll really change the market if these kids start getting that too.
Kevin Hayes just got a 50 MILLION dollar contract. I think he’s doing quite alright. Is he not the epitome of the NHL middle class?
There are always exceptions, but he clearly benefitted from his UFA status. It's the guys on the tiers below him that are feeling it, the bottom-6'ers.
You make Mitch sound terrible. Hope the Leafs trade him rather than deal with that kind of attitude.
So he can sit out just like Nylander did if he doesn't like Dubas' offers. Also you don't think it matters that Marner would be pissed about his contract, in Toronto? How much will the Toronto media make of it every time he has anything but a smile on his face? "Is Mitch mad?" "Does he want out?" Not only would his attitude affect his play, but it could start affecting others if those things become an everyday distraction. Your coach seems to think a bit more of Marner than you do since he puts him on the ice more than your franchise center.
Not doubting the validity of that, but it needs a bit of context. Is that for all four lines or just top six players? Because these are both top line players we are comparing, so what happens between 3rd or 4th line players isn't really relevant. Does being a team's leading scorer factor in that?
Toronto media? You're reaching so hard, lol.
If nylander is worth 7, Marner is worth at least 11Jesus...he didn't cave into Nylander....
The NHL salary landscape is rapidly changing, the NHL middle class is getting squeezed hard.
While these RFA's do deserve the money based on their production, what's left for these UFA's that are slowly seeing their money decrease and being given to the kids? In a sense, the NTC/NMC protection is earned through tenure.
It might change in the future, but that'll really change the market if these kids start getting that too.