Taylor26
Registered User
if lucia scores 40 points this year he will be a top prospect. (similar production to bjugstad)
Lucia is no bjugstad what world do you live in? I like Lucia but c'mon man.
if lucia scores 40 points this year he will be a top prospect. (similar production to bjugstad)
Lucia is no bjugstad what world do you live in? I like Lucia but c'mon man.
Yes, it is. Just look at the number of players taken after the 2nd round that play more than 100 games in the NHL. We're talking less than 10%. The fact that TB struck gold on a couple of players doesn't mean the exception is now the rule. Of course we've heard all about the late rounders that turn into stars (Zetterberg, Datsyuk, etc), but again, they are the exceptions.
DR wouldn't have had the smarts or the cojones to make the deals that Fletcher did to bring in Coyle or Niederreiter. DR was very trade-averse (is that a word?)
DR was shy of IMPACT trading. Pavol Demitra was the only impact player received in a trade. (You had it listed in reverse for some reason though)Not necessarily - drafting is only part of the game, good development is the other. Minnesota has mediocre development outside their goaltending coach.
Can't say much about the other guys that were hired after Fletcher - though Cher...whatever his name is in Winnipeg looks like a disaster...but that's not saying much.
Uh what?
Dwayne Roloson for a 1st and 3rd
Pavol Demitra for a 1st and Patrick O'Sullivan
4th round pick for Cliff Ronning
Manny Fernandez for Petr Kalus and a 4th round pick
Pascal Dupuis for Adam Hall
Willie Mitchell and a 2nd round pick for Shawn Belle and Martin Skoula
Zbynek Michael for Erik Westrum and Dustin Wood
Todd White for a 4th round pick
Marek Zidlick for Ryan Jones and a 2nd round pick
DR was not trade shy. In fact, he was constantly tinkering with the roster.
He's done okay but most of his picks outside the first round haven't really done anything. Zucker, Haula and Kuemper. Maybe Graovac and Olofsson but most of his other picks have been busts. We still haven't developed any elite goal scorer either, which our young core is missing.
Tough start for our team here in Iowa. Missed last weekends game, but went last night.
Ive been big on Graovac and Phillips in the past and nothing has changed over the summer. Graovac looked very good and is improving everyday I think, can step in for Brodziak anytime, Phillips looked 50% faster and after watching him in pre-season with Minnesota confirmed what Ive thought that he is close.
Clearly, they are our top 2 and based on how they were handled at camp and playing in pre season and length of time they were with big club, Fletcher and company agree.
Really liked the Schroder kid, very quick, being a 2009 drafted kid, I expected alot and wasnt disappointed.
DR was shy of IMPACT trading. Pavol Demitra was the only impact player received in a trade. (You had it listed in reverse for some reason though)
Otherwise DR was trading away worthy assets for junk - ala Zbynek Michalek for Westrum and Wood... such a waste!
That said, Fletcher has drafted these players after the 1st round... Hackett/Kuemper/Haula/Bulmer/Larsson/Zucker and they've all played in the NHL.
And IMHO, these players who have shown they have the potential to play in the league, who have been drafted outside the 1st round... Gustafsson/Lucia/Graovac/Gilmour/Olofsson/Gabriel and Labbe.
sometimes you have to draft to fill a need. hey great night for a few prospects tuch scored one , gilmour 2! also super mario got one. maybe our depth isnt as bad as you think. just not many ready to fill in for the wild if injuries.
Eh, I don't know about that. The Roloson and Fernandez trades were impact trading. He didn't trade a lot of young guys.
I remember getting bashed over that trade because I thought it was dumb at the time and most Wild fans were for the trade.
Larsson and Hackett are no longer with the organization and Bulmer looks like a bust (he can't stay healthy or even really contribute). That's like saying Wanvig, Foy and Wallin contributed for the Wild.
Potential sure, but who knows. Right now we also (for the first time in a long time) have a log jam at defense, so I wouldn't be surprised if we traded a few of them.
BPA vs need is not black and white, either or. The good GMs consider both before selecting or trading up and down.