I see a lot of parallels between GMCF and GMDR up until this point. Fletcher has made a few more splash trades but the question becomes does Fletcher has the guts to push this team over the top. What ultimately got DR fired was his God-awful trade deadline moves. Fletcher has the opportunity to change that but does he have the guts to do that? It remains to be seen.
If there is one thing Fletcher has shown, it's that he is definitely not afraid to make a move:
Pominville... worked
Moulson... didn't work
Burns, Havlat, Clutterbuck trades could be viewed as "shake ups" to varying degrees.
If this organization stumbles down the stretch and going into the trade deadline, does Fletcher have the guts to move a guy like Koivu? Like Dumba? Like Tuch? to make this organization and franchise better or will he make some conservative moves like DR.
If you're locking him into those type of moves, you're likely to be disappointed. Again, he has had 2 years where we were in contention at the TD and he's made larger moves at both deadlines.
Good organizations are always active and moving pieces around.
Which Fletcher has done for literally his entire tenure here. You complain about his misfires constantly, but nobody bats 1.000
Look at a team like Los Angeles and how active they were last year...they were't just moving pieces for their team then (Gaborik) but pieces for the future (moving Fasching and Deslauries for draft picks/young players).
Again, Fletcher has made an equivalent move as the Gaborik deal (Pominville).
Fletcher hasn't really done ANY of that in his career here and I think that separates him from some of the other GMs that are always and constantly tinkering with their roster because they aren't satisfied with their roster.
This is just blatantly false, as explained above.
This is a huge year for Fletcher; does he stay pat at the deadline or does he start moving pieces (and maybe big pieces) around? Do we have the players to move at the deadline? Labbe? Olofsson? Phillips? Graovac? Tuch? Dumba? Bulmer? Bussieres? Does an organization outside of Minnesota think highly of their development to trade for them?
You're already complaining that our organizational depth (Iowa) sucks, but now you're in favor of gutting it even further to add to the NHL roster? Which is it?
Furthermore, we haven't seen any big movement within the organization in terms of the front office. Iowa has been God-awful. Our best player only played 31 games before he was called up...Our best player after that had 33 points and barely edged a DEFENSEMAN as our best player, who we traded at the deadline
.
Iowa sucks because half of our NHL roster is under 25 years old and we've been drafting fairly heavily on NCAA prospects.
This organization has struggled to actually develop forward prospects for more than a year. I think Zucker is the only one? Fontaine? Haula barely had a year in the AHL, Granlund and Coyle as well had half a season. Guys like Bulmer, Bussieres, Phillips have looked like busts and haven't developed at all. You have to ask yourself is it the organization or the players they are picking?
Yeah, maybe those guys were bad picks. **** happens.