SuperGenius
For Duty & Humanity!
- Mar 18, 2008
- 4,639
- 200
I think getting Richards as a reclamation project does make sense under the right circumstances. If a bad contract can be moved, if Los Angeles retains 50%, if everyone recognizes that the right move was not to pick him up back in 2011 at whatever the astronomical price would have been, if he's brought in with the understanding that he's an asset that is being acquired for the purpose of being moved as soon as the right value comes along.
Even if all of this comes to pass - who sits? He's an ineffective W. I'm sure he's still better than Tropp or Boll, but would we really want to pay a guy ~2.5M just to be better than Tropp or Boll? Even at half off, I just don't like it. He have some upside somewhere other than LA, but I don't think it's here.