Michalek vs Richards

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Michalek#9, Jan 12, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Michalek#9

    Michalek#9 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Saskatoon, Canada
    Home Page:
    Milan Michalek or Mike Richards
    who would you rather have
     
  2. CFABoy

    CFABoy Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Analyst
    Location:
    Richmond, BC
    Home Page:
    Michalek will be solid two-way player for 15 years.
     
  3. leafaholix*

    leafaholix* Guest

    Michalek.

    Richards will be a solid player... but Milan Michalek has much better offensive potential.
     
  4. st_roland

    st_roland Guest

    I havent seen either of these guys play, but its interesting that this is the 3 michalek comparision this week. Michalek is def. a dynamic player....I cant wait till he gets healthy. I wonder though if SJ fans wish they had drafted Phaneuf(9) and Parise(17) though...those two are certainly looking to be more of the game breaker type of player that every team covets and the type of player that you build around. Imagine Stuart and Phaneuf on the blueline behind Sturm Marleau and Parise.....*drools*.
     
  5. Vlad The Impaler

    Vlad The Impaler Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,072
    Likes Received:
    229
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Montreal
    I think this will be an easy win for Michalek by popular choice. I haven't seen him enough to truly understand what the deal is with this guy.

    All I can say is that I REALLY like Mike Richards and think he is one of the good "unsexy" picks of this draft. There is no single flashy hockey attribute in Richards that will make anyone drool. Because of that some may see him as having a limited upside.

    But this guy DELIVERS. He's always there doing the things that make a team successful. And people also talk about his leadership abilities. As far as I'm concerned, I am sold on this player when I look at him on the ice.

    I think you could easily make a case and say 40-50 players have more upside than Mike Richards in his draft year but don't be surprised if by the end of his NHL career he is one of the top 20 best of his draft class. he will get to the NHL, IMO . And he will have staying power and do what he always does: deliver.

    His skills may be a bit underrated as well. He utilizes his skills well thanks to being a smart player. He's got the tools and unlike other prospects, I don't have second thoughts that he might not have the toolbox to use them.

    Pierre McGuire has talked so much of Zach Parise that he isn't the super-secret player he uses to be. It is much the opposite. I feel personally that Mike Richards has become one of the least talked about good guys in this draft. Much like Parise, he is of relatively small built by today's standards, works hard and diligently and has nice skills. It is very strange that so much is said about Parise but almost nothing on Richards. The difference in talent between the two is NOT equal to the difference in hype and coverage, that's for sure.
     
  6. Vlad The Impaler

    Vlad The Impaler Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,072
    Likes Received:
    229
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Montreal
    Oh. I forgot to answer your question directly :)

    *I* would rather have Richards, knowing fully well that it is VERY possible I will be wrong.

    Why? Because I have seen him and feel safe with him. I still have doubts on Michalek because I have not seen him much. And I have decided to always go with what feels right for *me*. It works like a charm.

    It's not an advice, though. Don't take it as such. He's just the player *I* would rather have based on what *I* know.
     
  7. Birko19

    Birko19 Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    11,198
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hamilton, Ont
    Home Page:
    .

    Personally, out of the 2003 draft I would rather have the following players ahead of Michalek:

    Fleury (Brodeur's style)
    Staal (Francis's style)
    Zherdev (Kovalev's style)
    Horton (Gurien's style)
    Phaneuf (Steven's style)
    Suter (Suter's style)
    Coburn (Pronger's style)
    Praise (Weight's style)
    Carter (Sundin's style)

    Then it's between Michalek and Vanek, it all depends on how Vanek does, he's more of a hit or miss prospect, he could be the next Marian Hossa, or he can bust out.

    I love Michalek, he's a great prospect, but I just don't see him becoming an offencive force in this league (I could be wrong), but if I'm right, he'll be a Bobby Holik type of player with more speed which is amazing, but not as great as the prospects I named (I could be wrong again).

    But back to this thread, I would rather have Michalek over Richards.
     
  8. Strizzi

    Strizzi Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2002
    Messages:
    3,078
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Can we please stop all these "Michalek vs. ?" threads again please? Three whithin a few days should be enough IMO, especially as Michalek is still out with an injury.
     
  9. Vlad The Impaler

    Vlad The Impaler Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,072
    Likes Received:
    229
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Montreal
    Can we do a Michalek VS Batman real quick before we stop? :p
     
  10. Strizzi

    Strizzi Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2002
    Messages:
    3,078
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    OK, I'll give you that one ;)
     
  11. West

    West Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2002
    Messages:
    753
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Programmer Analyst
    Location:
    Toronto
    Home Page:
    Michalek reminds me alot of Jan Rita or Manny Malhotra. Good size and speed that play's a hard working two way game but will have little NHL succuess. So just for the record I'd take any player who's a realistic bet to break 500+ NHL games over him.

    I'm basing this on my own limited viewing of him during WJC and the fact that a most posters here who claim to have watched him in the cze. league seemed very unimpressed.
     
  12. Cyclops II*

    Cyclops II* Guest

    I'll take Batman but it's close. :lol:
     
  13. 6 String Benny

    6 String Benny Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2003
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Service Manager
    Location:
    Kenora On.
    Mikey all the way.Not just because he is my hometown boy.He has been underated for too long and time will prove him to be one of the biggest steals of the draft.He does everthing well and is a complete player.I wonder what Deboer's reply to this thread would be.No knock on Michalek but hats of to the Flyers.You guys have a futur star in the making.Hats of to Vlad the Impaler also for seeing Mike for what he is-a rock solid player.
     
  14. canucksfan

    canucksfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2002
    Messages:
    34,240
    Likes Received:
    513
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    British Columbia
    Home Page:
    Michalek only because he has better offensive skills than Richards.
     
  15. X-SHARKIE

    X-SHARKIE Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,362
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Janesville Wisconsin
    Home Page:
    Michalek lack of scoring his been to much of a deal IMO. He has all the tools and skills, and smarts, ect. everything to become the San Jose Sharks version of Martin Havlat. He shows flashes of Gaborik as well. Plus with Selke worth defense. How can you say no to Michalek? He's going to be a 70 point scorer someday IMO.
     
  16. Winston Wolf

    Winston Wolf Registered User

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    10,880
    Likes Received:
    2,803
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    Oahu, HI
    So he looked like Martin Havlat, showed flashes of Gaborik and Selke worth defense in his 12-13 total minutes of NHL experience? I bet.....

    I think this would be a lot closer had Richards been picked sooner, I think most people are still basing this on where they were picked and not their actual play. Had Phaneuf already been taken before the 9th spot, Calgary said they would have picked Richards, so this just shows how deep this draft was and how a player's position could've been changed 15 spots that easily.
     
  17. 6 String Benny

    6 String Benny Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2003
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Service Manager
    Location:
    Kenora On.
     
  18. X-SHARKIE

    X-SHARKIE Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,362
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Janesville Wisconsin
    Home Page:
    OMG, I said 0 about there draft position. I'm 100% sure that Michalek is a better player. I see Michalek has a top 6 forward and Richards as a top 9.

    I saw MIchalek at the WJC last year, 2 games this year, and one Czech Extra league game.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"