CherryToke
Registered User
Marner
Point will ask for a lot more, when his bridge ends.
He might even ask for Marner money.
Marner
Point will ask for a lot more, when his bridge ends.
But if the bridge deal helps keep the band together and they win, I don’t think they’ll care. Chicago was happy to pay Kane and Toews with 3 rings.Points next contract will be higher than Marners after 3 more years. or sh*t we will see.
I don't understand how you think its not an atrocious contract. Yeah, 11.6 I guess is fair (still a little high imo) on an 8-year contract. That would plant him square between McDavid and Eichel. On 5 years that unbelievably bad. His figure on an 8-year contract would have been 13+ million, making him the highest-paid player in the league. Essentially a guy who has never cracked 75 is paid more than McDavid (the Hart, 2x Lindsay, 2x Art Ross, youngest captain in the NHL, better defensively, plays more minutes, scores more goals, and leads a significantly worse team- that McDavid). Their resumes aren't comparable in the slightest- where did that number come from? Thus why it was an atrocious deal. 3 years off his contract is not some small statement to be dismissed, not to mention the bringing him to UFA where is his slated to get an absurd contract whether that be from the leafs or from some other team.Did Matthews run your dog over? It’s pretty peculiar how you’ll bring him into unrelated conversation just to slight him. You shouldn’t pay him so much mind because he’s never going to reciprocate. Sorry.
Re; Matthews - the most respected in the game take issue with Dubas giving max dollar without getting max term. Nobody credible thinks it’s ‘atrocious’, but he shouldn’t have moved on dollars without getting term. He falls in between Eichel and McDavid, as he should... but it should have been for longer.
You’re welcome to bury your head in the sand if you’d like, but when you’re disingenuous in your evaluation it has you looking silly. Especially when guys who earn a living on a rival team say things like this; https://www.bardown.com/david-pastr...-to-win-the-hart-trophy-next-season-1.1351599
...but hey, whatever makes you feel better!
With TB's cap structure, Point may still be making less on AAV than Marner is at 10.9 after 3 years. That's how bad the Marner deal was and how good Point's deal is for TB.I’ll come back to this in 3 years lol
Still will make less than Marner. And he’s better.Marner
Point will ask for a lot more, when his bridge ends.
Does Point have the same agent at Labanc asking for a friend.
Points next contract will be higher than Marners after 3 more years. or sh*t we will see.
This and only diehard fans with blinders on would vote for Marner's contract.Point contract, and it's not even remotely close.
Predictably, the slights to Matthews are closely followed by the McDavid comparisons complete with credentials and some points of opinion sold as fact. I should have bet.I don't understand how you think its not an atrocious contract. Yeah, 11.6 I guess is fair (still a little high imo) on an 8-year contract. That would plant him square between McDavid and Eichel. On 5 years that unbelievably bad. His figure on an 8-year contract would have been 13+ million, making him the highest-paid player in the league. Essentially a guy who has never cracked 75 is paid more than McDavid (the Hart, 2x Lindsay, 2x Art Ross, youngest captain in the NHL, better defensively, plays more minutes, scores more goals, and leads a significantly worse team- that McDavid). Their resumes aren't comparable in the slightest- where did that number come from? Thus why it was an atrocious deal. 3 years off his contract is not some small statement to be dismissed, not to mention the bringing him to UFA where is his slated to get an absurd contract whether that be from the leafs or from some other team.
I brought him up because he is completely relevant to the discussion. I honestly think Dubas did a decent job with the Marner contract, I was fully expecting to see the Toews-Kane contract scenario because frankly, Marner has an argument for that. Getting the extra year and 700K lower was some decent negotiation. So Matthews came up as I think Marner could have won this poll if it weren't for the Matthews' contract. I think he is better than Point, so but having outperformed an 11.6 million dollar teammate the year prior killed Dubas. Without that direct teammate comparable, Marner probably gets 10 x 6 or probably even less, which in turn I would take over Point at 6.75 x 3.
That's still way less than Marner is already making lol....and after
$9m QO
WTF do you want us to say??That's still way less than Marner is already making lol.
Is he now?Of course we'd all prefer Point's contract. No question!!
But Marner is the better player and is signed for 6 years instead of 3 so at least I will find some solace in that.
After reviewing the list of people voting for Marner in this thread, your logic checks out.This and only diehard fans with blinders on would vote for Marner's contract.
IDK, that Marner got way overpaid vs his comparables?WTF do you want us to say??
yup its part of being the hockey spotlight. Marner is over paid right now but soon enough it will be seen as a good deal.IDK, that Marner got way overpaid vs his comparables?
Everyone knows this. He shouldn’t have made a cent more than Kucherov. Dubas still gave it to him. Not much anyone on HF can do about it?IDK, that Marner got way overpaid vs his comparables?
yup its part of being the hockey spotlight. Marner is over paid right now but soon enough it will be seen as a good deal.
I expect 100 points from Marner and maybe 70-80 from Point
Everyone knows this. He shouldn’t have made a cent more than Kucherov. Dubas still gave it to him. Not much anyone on HF can do about it?
If your friends dog ****s on your rug, do you rub your friends nose in it?