Marchand - Crosby - Bergeron VS Huberdeau - McDavid - Mackinnon

[User9992]

Whis is better line? Or whom you'd rather have going into Olympics or NHL Playoffs?

Marchand - Crosby - Bergeron,

or

Huberdeau - McDavid - Mackinnon line?

Click to read more...

 

[The Moose is Loose]

You have to pick the 2nd option, they’re all in their prime. There is simply too much talent for anyone to choose the 1st more proven line.

 

[BigBadBruins7708]

Give me the line that we've seen flat out dominate together already

 

[End of Line]

If both are on the ice good luck trying to take the puck away from the 1st line.

 

[GreeningOil]

This is close. Maybe 3 years ago I’d select the 1st option… but who can argue against the “choker” line!

 

[sufferer]

Line 1 easily.

 

[Ivo]

Line 1 is the best I’ve seen in my lifetime. Since they are all still playing at a high level, I go with that one.

 

[User9992]

Line 1 is the best I’ve seen in my lifetime. Since they are all still playing at a high level, I go with that one.

Expected from Bruins' fan. LOL

 

[Ivo]

Expected from Bruins' fan. LOL

Well, duh! But anyway, the best player on that line is not a Bruin.

 

[TheGreenTBer]

Expected from Bruins' fan. LOL

He's saying that the second group of players is an unknown in terms of chemistry. All of those guys are brilliant hockey players on their own, but the guys in the first group have not only proven they can play together but that they can flat-out dominate together. Since all 3 of those players are still playing at a high level, it's not out of the realm of possibility that in crunch time one would choose the guys that have done it before. It's a reasonable opinion.

The second line obviously crushes the 1st in the skating department, that's undeniable.

 

[TheGreenTBer]

Line 1 is the best I’ve seen in my lifetime. Since they are all still playing at a high level, I go with that one.

What's in common with those 3 guys is absolutely brilliant hockey IQ, so it's no wonder they were so good together.

 

[Mulletman]

Since when does Huberdeau moonlight as a referee?!

 

[Gurglesons]

Marchand - Crosby - Bergeron quite easily.

 

[jcs0218]

You have to pick the 2nd option, they’re all in their prime. There is simply too much talent for anyone to choose the 1st more proven line.

This seems like it might be sarcasm.

"too much talent for anyone to choose the 1st more proven line".

 

[KoozNetsOff 92]

Line 2 has the 2 best players.

 

[jetsforever]

The 1st line is a bit old but they're all still elite and have shown great chemistry.

 

[I Hate Blake Coleman]

Line 1 is elite two way play if they're utilized correctly.

 

[Buck Naked]

Whom?

 

[teravaineSAROS]

As a non-Canadian I'm not looking forward to finding out

 

[rangersfansince08]

Its hard to see anybody shutting down Line 2 but Line 1 just might have the three players who could do it and still be great offensively. Line 1 would dominate face-offs and possession and frustrate the hell out of Line 2.

 

[wetcoast]

Marchand - Crosby - Bergeron quite easily.

I took them but not quite easily as the 2nd line easily could be as good or better starting right now.

But I went with the proven more versatile commodity here.

 

[Nihiliste]

2nd line has 2 play driving puck carriers. Not sure how they mesh together. Need to balance out the skill sets

 

[The Moose is Loose]

This seems like it might be sarcasm.

"too much talent for anyone to choose the 1st more proven line".

Huberdeau/McDavid/Mackinnon is simply too talented for me to choose Marchand/Crosby/Bergeron even though they’re more proven

 

[McYoungGuns]

Well other nations will tell you when they have to face both of these lines

 

[EdJovanovski]

Marchand-Crosby-Bergeron pretty easily.