Reaper45
Registered User
I like Jarnkrok and wouldn't mind Rinaldo coming in and providing some emotion on this team but that's a bad trade.
Glad your not in charge. You just screwed your own team. Sure we need to make some moves to this roster but you don’t sell your players at half price. On top of that King fans that think we would move Lewis just are not in touch with the LA Kings.
This is the same nonsense we've heard for years, "well the Kings can't move so and so because..."
Trevor Lewis is 31 years old, the Kings should be about to embark on a rebuild. He has a manageable contract and would have some value to a contender in a 4th line, leadership experience type role.
Why is it ridiculous to suggest the Kings would move him?
And just to clarify, I wouldn't do this trade, I'd much rather get younger pieces. Jarnkok is a decent player but his age doesn't fit in with a potential rebuild.
Blake's not rebuilding.This is the same nonsense we've heard for years, "well the Kings can't move so and so because..."
Trevor Lewis is 31 years old, the Kings should be about to embark on a rebuild. He has a manageable contract and would have some value to a contender in a 4th line, leadership experience type role.
Why is it ridiculous to suggest the Kings would move him?
And just to clarify, I wouldn't do this trade, I'd much rather get younger pieces. Jarnkok is a decent player but his age doesn't fit in with a potential rebuild.
I don't agree with u often but this is the most realistic thing u have ever saidBlake's not rebuilding.
A 3rd liner and a 4th liner making a total of 5.75 million.I'd rather keep Jarnkrok and Rinaldo at 2.6 million than Pearson and Lewis at 5.75 million.
LMAO you aint wrong. So we doing this trade?? I will throw in a free drink coupon from Bridgestone to make this happenZac Rinaldo’s value is less than toe nail clippings.
Return seems pretty light for the Kings tbh.