if, of all the people you know/met in life you can name only 3 that did so, you can easily conclude that they are a minority (and there's a reason for that), just like Kriss who talked of ONE person.
I could name you a few others actually, but I have a feeling you might answer ''where's the proof? Anybody can say that''. So really, why should I bother.
And as someone else posted, many people either get their tuition paid for by their folks or through loans/scholarships/grants, so they get to focus on their studies better, but in no way does that mean they would fail if they had to work on the side.
I know plenty of people that have done it, at a young age, or older one as refugees.
it's not that it's impossible, it's just that it isnt as easy as some (like Kriss) seems to think.
Never said it was easy. Just said it was a very plausible possibility. No success in life comes easy, none.
Nobody forced Geoff Molson to buy the Montreal Canadiens. Does that mean that he doesn't have financial risk either?
Sure, but this isn't his first business venture.
My point is that the risk Molson takes paying over 100M in expenses on a yearly basis is different from the one a young kid takes when he opts for his 1st career path. That's why I called it a life choice, to differentiate both.
I mean, the equivalent risk or life choice an owner takes to the one the player takes is when he chooses to pursue a career in business (or wtv first career choice he opted for) at a young age.
Louis Leblanc was a highly rated player. Maybe he didn't have to work as hard as some scrub who had to work ten times harder to be a 4th liner. And maybe if Darche and Leblanc had dedicated themselves more to the game they'd have been much better players...
How do you tell that to the last cut of an NHL team? How do you tell the guy who just missed out on an NHL career? The AHL is full of guys who might even be NHL calibre but for whatever reason never got to show it...
Sure, maybe they would have been better, maybe not. No way to know really. All we do know is that they made the NHL without completely jeopardizing their education.
It has to come from within. No one can really tell Angelo Esposito to retire from hockey and go back into medicine, he alone can take that decision. The point is that the option for him to do so is there.
It's different because those kids at least have degrees to fall back on.
But what's the point of having a degree in finance when you can't get a decent job in the field? Or getting a dead end job.
It's the same thing as a player reaching the AHL and grabbing a 40K salary.
At that point, you still have the possibility of quitting and opting for a new career path.
That's because those NHL players took the risks earlier in life... Doesn't mean that no risks existed.
I realize that it's not the same kind of thing but to sit there and pretend that the players are fat cats who don't really have any skin in the game just isn't accurate and that's all I'm saying.
Yes, the owners foot the bill but those players had to work pretty damn hard to get there with no saftey net underneath. Sure once they get there they've mitigated the risk but the risk was in getting there in the first place.
My point was that the risk any kid takes to pursue a career is the same, regardless of the job. Different curriculum, but same thing. Every one will need to put in extra work and have the talent necessary to reach maximum success.
That's why I'll call it more of a life choice.
And I agree, I don't think players are fat cats. At the same time, I don't think the owners are the big evil operating from hell. I think both sides are dumb and I really couldn't care less who gets what as it affects me in no way. All I care about is for games to start.