Post-Game Talk (GBU): Lindy gets #600
- Thread starter kirby11
- Start date
enthusiast
cybersabre his prophet
- Oct 20, 2009
- 18,668
- 5,989
La Cosa Nostra
Caporegime
- Jun 25, 2009
- 14,074
- 2,336
G: losing in regulation
Enroth. He was playing like a elite goalie tonight. Too bad he is inconsistent.
Ennis. He has been real good lately. He deserves to get the same contract Hodgson signed. He will be a good part of our team going forward, even after we add our high end picks into the equation. As a LW2 with the capability of switching to center he is the versatile 50-55 point scoring forward every team needs.
B:
Myers
Stewart. Bad first game but unless he's traded I will give him the rest of the season + some of next before passing judgment.
Losing to Lindy
U:
The refs. 6-1 pp discrepancy when the Sabres should have received a few more pps? Yeah that was bs.
All in all the game was a success as we didn't pick up a single point. Too bad the Flames lost in regulation too.
Enroth. He was playing like a elite goalie tonight. Too bad he is inconsistent.
Ennis. He has been real good lately. He deserves to get the same contract Hodgson signed. He will be a good part of our team going forward, even after we add our high end picks into the equation. As a LW2 with the capability of switching to center he is the versatile 50-55 point scoring forward every team needs.
B:
Myers
Stewart. Bad first game but unless he's traded I will give him the rest of the season + some of next before passing judgment.
Losing to Lindy
U:
The refs. 6-1 pp discrepancy when the Sabres should have received a few more pps? Yeah that was bs.
All in all the game was a success as we didn't pick up a single point. Too bad the Flames lost in regulation too.
Flynn,Ennis,Enroth,Stafford and Moulson were great.
Stewart is an eyesore
Myers was meh through the first 40, solid last period IMO
Stewart is an eyesore
Myers was meh through the first 40, solid last period IMO
enthusiast
cybersabre his prophet
- Oct 20, 2009
- 18,668
- 5,989
G: ENROTH
Ennis
Stafford
Foligno
Moulson (up that trade value)
Myers got better as the game went on.
Hodgson was quietly dangerous.
Weber
Hoff
Girgs. Effort was there, had a couple struggles but its fine. Hes going to be amazing.
Ruff milestone.
B:
McBain
Hate. Leino. Haaaaate.
U:
Refs
Stars PP.
LETS GO FUTURE SHOPPING BOYS!!
Ennis
Stafford
Foligno
Moulson (up that trade value)
Myers got better as the game went on.
Hodgson was quietly dangerous.
Weber
Hoff
Girgs. Effort was there, had a couple struggles but its fine. Hes going to be amazing.
Ruff milestone.
B:
McBain
Hate. Leino. Haaaaate.
U:
Refs
Stars PP.
LETS GO FUTURE SHOPPING BOYS!!
Squantosawuss
Registered User
Forgive the guy for prob not having his head totally in it.
One minute you're with a Cup contender, the next minute you're.....well....not exactly with a contender.
Paxon
202* Stanley Cup Champions
Someone (Layne I think) did raise a good point in the GDT: it's much preferable that the Oilers finish 2nd. The 2nd place team is more likely than the 3rd to win the lottery, and the Oilers are more likely to take Ekblad than Calgary. Not as important as finishing last, but it's certainly the better scenario.
Timbo Slice
Roaring back
Timbo Slice
Roaring back
Forgive the guy for prob not having his head totally in it.
One minute you're with a Cup contender, the next minute you're.....well....not exactly with a contender.
And he knows he most likely is leaving tomorrow or Wednesday, too. Can't blame the guy.
Skipped this one. Couldn't muster any F's to give about what happens on the ice right now. Kinda "sabred out" after the last few days.
Wouldnt that make you play with your hair on fire? Getting traded to a buyer should be motivation to impress.
Prospector74
Registered User
G: exciting game
Enroth
'Hoff
Couple big hits
B:
Stewart. Not impressed but probably needs time to fit in. Fine if we move him tomorrow.
U:
Ehhhh.....
Enroth
'Hoff
Couple big hits
B:
Stewart. Not impressed but probably needs time to fit in. Fine if we move him tomorrow.
U:
Ehhhh.....
G:
- Why is Scott listed as bad? I thought he made a whole lot of good, basic plays. Timely step-ups, solid eliminations, shot-blocks. and cleared the crease like the monster he is. As a 6/7 he was easily better than, say, Weber.
- Obviously Enroth goes straight to Asgaard after tonight.
- Stafford played the right way.
- Myers was noticeable in a good way and did his best to assert his will on the game.
- Ennis obviously.
- Ehrhoff playing like a man that wants to be traded.
B:
- I think I gotta put Stewart here. What an uneven player, even shift to shift. Giving it away, laying the body, making cross ice passes to streaking teammates, floating around. I'm still not sure what I saw.
U:
- Did Leino play?
- Why is Scott listed as bad? I thought he made a whole lot of good, basic plays. Timely step-ups, solid eliminations, shot-blocks. and cleared the crease like the monster he is. As a 6/7 he was easily better than, say, Weber.
- Obviously Enroth goes straight to Asgaard after tonight.
- Stafford played the right way.
- Myers was noticeable in a good way and did his best to assert his will on the game.
- Ennis obviously.
- Ehrhoff playing like a man that wants to be traded.
B:
- I think I gotta put Stewart here. What an uneven player, even shift to shift. Giving it away, laying the body, making cross ice passes to streaking teammates, floating around. I'm still not sure what I saw.
U:
- Did Leino play?
HOOats
NO DOOM NO GLOOM
Came to post the same thing. Some of the most simple and effective in-zone punishment I can remember seeing from a defender of ours in a long while. A couple gaffs and the usual early penalty, but also some decent forays in to space. I'm starting to wonder if this isn't an early mad scientist experiment by Murray. I'm a big John Scott fan what can I say.
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/Eastern/Atlantic/Buffalo.html
It appears certain, but not quite yet 0.4% left if we go 21-0
NotABadPeriod
ForFriendshipDikembe
- Oct 28, 2006
- 52,043
- 8,684
Uneven. A couple decent plays, but defensively some real bad ones, including leading to the first goal against.
Stewart looked pretty bad. He didn't have a strong body presence, and was easily knocked off the puck. Maybe he was playing a bit softer, but for someone labeled a 'power forward' he looked like Drew Stafford light. And that's not mean to be a knock on Stafford, but he's not much of a power forward.
wunderpanda
Registered User
- Apr 9, 2012
- 5,537
- 532
G- Ennis/Stafford/Moulson
Enroth
It was a loss and some players weren't good, but nobody was bad exactly. Leino played 6 or 7 minutes, Stewart gets a pass with the potential trade situation. Didn't want to lose to Dallas or Ruff, but I guess its a nice narrative that his 600th win was against the team he was with forever.
U- Milbury, that rant he went on was over the top
Enroth
It was a loss and some players weren't good, but nobody was bad exactly. Leino played 6 or 7 minutes, Stewart gets a pass with the potential trade situation. Didn't want to lose to Dallas or Ruff, but I guess its a nice narrative that his 600th win was against the team he was with forever.
U- Milbury, that rant he went on was over the top
HOOats
NO DOOM NO GLOOM
No really, I was driving down the Skyway...
Enjoy that thing while it lasts, take it from me
Someone throw me some odds on Scott playing D for more than half of of our remaining games...
