Jacob
as seen on TV
- Feb 27, 2002
- 49,474
- 25,071
Lindros wasn’t very bright even before the repeated braun trauma.
I cannot see hockey ever removing contact and I do not want to see that but Scott Stevens played to hurt people and I can understand why so many people hate him. Someone should not be punished for life because they did not have their head up.
You’ve got it backwards there. The Casual Fan is the market for a more physical game. People who know nothing else about the sport can appreciate huge hits and fights.
This isn’t about appealing to fans. This is about a brewing legal war between the players/alumni and the league.
Lindros wasn’t very bright even before the repeated braun trauma.
That would kill the NHL as a viable sport. And eventually, someone would start a league with hitting and fighting (and contracts acknowledging the sport is "dangerous") and we'd be back right where we are.
It's a contact sport, so even on clean hits guys will suffer concussions from the impact of the hit. There's no getting around that.The league eventually is going to have to figure out where those huge open ice hits land. Catching a guy crossing the blue line with his head down makes for fantastic highlights and it's prime "hockey", but it is a huge injury liability. The league will need to figure out what level of concussion risk is acceptable and those big body checks are a huge injury risk. Even on supposedly clean plays, shoulder to the chest and feet on the ice, the risk of injury is still substantial due to the forces involved. The NHL and NHLPA will need to recognize this and come to terms with the levels of risk they are willing to accept.
.
Lindros wasn’t very bright even before the repeated braun trauma.
Lindros was his own worst enemy. He was reckless out there like a bull in a China shop running over everyone. He was unaware if his surroundings. Most times that approach worked for him because he was bigger and stronger than most players but on occasion he would meet up with a player just as solid.And the last scenario is Scott Stevens ending his career because he couldn't keep his head up.
Not that I fully agree with doing this but I don't think it would kill hockey or any other over reactionary bull****. Women's hockey has minimal contact and it's fine (yes I know they have contact but they aren't body checking the same way). If anything, it could help hockey leading to the game becoming more offensive. Goals and players chasing records wins fans.
And hockey is too much of a niche sport at this point and the NHL's grip on it is too firmly planted to worry about a competitor again sadly so they could do it without a loss imo.
What's odd about the article is there's not really a direct quote of Lindros saying this. He somewhat references it in how he still has fun playing today without contact.
Was this just an off-handed comment that they're blowing out of proportion? Or is he genuinely advocating that the NHL actually become the No Hit League?
What's odd about the article is there's not really a direct quote of Lindros saying this. He somewhat references it in how he still has fun playing today without contact.
Was this just an off-handed comment that they're blowing out of proportion? Or is he genuinely advocating that the NHL actually become the No Hit League?
Not that I fully agree with doing this but I don't think it would kill hockey or any other over reactionary bull****. Women's hockey has minimal contact and it's fine (yes I know they have contact but they aren't body checking the same way). If anything, it could help hockey leading to the game becoming more offensive. Goals and players chasing records wins fans.
And hockey is too much of a niche sport at this point and the NHL's grip on it is too firmly planted to worry about a competitor again sadly so they could do it without a loss imo.
I'm all for getting head shots out of hockey but this is a contact sport. Nobody is forcing you to play. You don't like It? Go play in a seniors beer league.