LightningStrikes
Champa Bay Lightning
- Nov 24, 2009
- 26,175
- 9,992
This is a signing I like. Pushes Ruuta right the **** out.
I'm pretty sure he mostly played forward for them.Did he play in NHL with Detroit recently? Does he have a chance to be our #6/7?
Welcome back!
Yzerman does not seem too concerned about physicality (or lack thereof) on the Red Wings. I guess he's trying to build another finesse team over there. He did the same thing in Tampa and slowly phased out scrappiness and hitting. He got rid of Downie and Malone and did not really replace heavy / frequent hitters like Ohlund or Brewer.Yzerman must hate him he got rid of him twice
Yzerman does not seem too concerned about physicality (or lack thereof) on the Red Wings. I guess he's trying to build another finesse team over there. He did the same thing in Tampa and slowly phased out scrappiness and hitting. He got rid of Downie and Malone and did not really replace heavy / frequent hitters like Ohlund or Brewer.
Meanwhile JBB has acknowledged that we didn't have a lot of toughness and sandpaper (outside of maybe Cernak, Paquette and Erne who I wouldn't consider 'heavy players' anyway) and that we got dominated by Columbus' physicality in the playoffs (among other things). The most recent acquisitions of Schenn and Witkowski point that way.
Gotta say, I'm not complaining. When the going gets tough it won't hurt to have a couple guys ready to jump into the lineup to set the tone on the ice and create some space for our skilled players the shift after.
Quantity maybe, but I can't recall a single impactful hit from a Lightning player that changed the tone of the game/series. Remember Miller drilling Lovejoy two times in one shift in the Devils series? The crowd was on their feet and the team pushed even harder afterwards. I'm not saying that's why we got swept but it sure can swing momentum in our way, especially when your coach and star players seem to be out of ideas and the opponent slowly grinds you out of the game and has "bounces going their way".We had 27 more hits in that series than Columbus. We out hit them every game. This narrative that we are a soft team who were physically dominated needs to end.
Quantity maybe, but I can't recall a single impactful hit from a Lightning player that changed the tone of the game/series. Remember Miller drilling Lovejoy two times in one shift in the Devils series? The crowd was on their feed and the team pushed even harder afterwards. I'm not saying that's why we got swept but it sure can swing momentum in our way, especially when your coach and star players seem to be out of ideas and the opponent slowly grinds you out of the game and has "bounces going their way".
We also didn't look great in any of the many scrums in that series. A timely gloves drop and subsequent pummeling of an opponent player during a scrum in front of your goalie can also send a message to your team when they're turtling and coasting. Let alone keeping the opponent honest.
Schenn/Witkowski are clearly acquisitions for the playoffs when stuff like that starts to matter. I too don't expect Wit (and to a lesser extend Schenn) to play a lot during the regular season - barring injuries.
Yzerman does not seem too concerned about physicality (or lack thereof) on the Red Wings. I guess he's trying to build another finesse team over there. He did the same thing in Tampa and slowly phased out scrappiness and hitting. He got rid of Downie and Malone and did not really replace heavy / frequent hitters like Ohlund or Brewer.
Meanwhile JBB has acknowledged that we didn't have a lot of toughness and sandpaper (outside of maybe Cernak, Paquette and Erne who I wouldn't consider 'heavy players' anyway) and that we got dominated by Columbus' physicality in the playoffs (among other things). The most recent acquisitions of Schenn and Witkowski point that way.
Gotta say, I'm not complaining. When the going gets tough it won't hurt to have a couple guys ready to jump into the lineup to set the tone on the ice and create some space for our skilled players the shift after.