@Flamingo (from the GDT)
Shot differential really opened up in the 3rd, which could mostly be attributed to score effect. Did you see the line we iced for the final power play? We weren't trying to score anymore.
A couple penalties against us were weak calls. And they got away with some dodgy stuff.
I root for most young goalies to do well. I don't like Sparks's super-aggressive positioning. He's giving up way too much ice behind him. Maybe this is Babcock's way of training his defencemen to tie up everyone within 30 feet of the net, because if they don't, it's going in the net.
Shots by Period were:
Leafs: 7, 11, 11
Sens: 7, 6, 4
After the 2nd period the score was only 2-0 and we had already started to not play well. I think Cameron putting out our 4th line on the PP had more to do with the 1st/2nd units doing absolutely nothing than trying not to run up the score.
Our 4th line seemed to be the only group capable of sustaining any offensive zone pressure. (Note: War-on-Ice confirms that Lazar/Paul/Neil were are only even Corsi players, everyone else was well in the negatives)
War on Ice has the shot attempts at 66/36 for the Leafs over the Sens. 41% of our zone starts were in the O-zone.
I get what you're saying about the score effect, but it wasn't until the beginning of the 3rd that we had a 3-0 lead. It's not like it was 4-0 after the 1st period. There is no reason why we shouldn't have been able to take it to the leafs for an entire 60 minutes, they are icing one of the worst rosters in the entire league and we couldn't even manage a complete effort against them.
If I'm the leafs I'm extremely happy with the effort we put in vs a much more talented opponent. You chalk the loss up to the lack of experience in net and congratulate everyone on a game well played.