some teams just have that aspect. like for the longest time, San Jose couldn't beat Buffalo (either IN buffalo, or at home) either.for the most part, if we play the ducks, I'm betting on us winning, because we almost always beat them (it feels like)
Okay. taking this aside - (and i just had to watch TSN and sure enough it's "well i'd be concerned you're supposed to blow a team out like that") - again. bad teams just don't get their wins vs. bad teams. Boston and Tampa lost twice against Buffalo. it shouldn't be seen as an automatic win. (that's just my opinion anyway).
and as i am sure the sky is falling for some -
1: I'd rather the Leafs look sketchy now in the early part of March vs. the end of March first of april before the playoff start.
2: Yes the Leafs don't look as good with their number one goalie not playing so well - most teams tend to be a bit leaky in this regard, just putting that out there.
3: Could Andersen use some rest - sure but I feel this decision is made by the sports science department and Babcock's input and Andersen's input.
4: Was this game a litmus test/should we be scared? no from how this road game went - we should be 2 and 2. we should have won in Florida, didn't. and this game was picture perfect everything that went in, went in, for Buffalo (we had a few of those games ourselves). the Leafs now - have a week off with 1 league mandated no ice day to get said rest, to shore up on some systems, and more importantly get Matthews back so everything is a bit more balanced.
life is okay.
stop looking for the dirty side of the penny.