The combined salaries this season for David Booth ($1.1M), Mike Santorelli ($1.5M), Daniel Winnick ($1.3M) and Konitola ($1.1M) come in at a total of $5 million—or a half-million less per season than the going rate for David Bolland when he left the Leafs for the Florida Panthers.
Bolland played 15 real games for us last season, and if we payed him $5.5M for 5 years, that would suffocate remaining cap space. Instead, we used his money to sign Kontiola, Santorelli, Booth, and Winnik. Thats solid depth, and Bolland would be a 3C on our team anyways. Smart move Shanahan/Nonis. THATS how you put a team that will compete on the ice...by creating..you know..COMPETITION!! GLG
The thing is that they were prepared to sign Bolland to close to that. He just chose the richer offer from the Panthers. Doesn't really inspire much faith.
We were going to pay him under 5. and he took 5.5 in a place with low taxes. Even if taxes didn't affect the deal we are talking about 2.5-4 mil on the contract. That is not a chump change for most people. Add the lower taxes in the state of Florida and it's quite a bit of cash
Wha?!?!?!
Very surprised to see an article that inspires hope the blue and white with limited "singings" and no huge splashes.
The Hockey News needs to take notes from Sportsnet.
The thing is that they were prepared to sign Bolland to close to that. He just chose the richer offer from the Panthers. Doesn't really inspire much faith.
It is more accurate to say the Leafs rejected Bollands demands, and he went to where the money is.
Well I wouldn't say it's more accurate, just a convenient interpretation of events.It is more accurate to say the Leafs rejected Bollands demands, and he went to where the money is.
Bolland is a tool.
Made a lot of solid small signings. Which is really what you should do when it comes to those bottom 6 positions. Find cost effective guys.
Well I wouldn't say it's more accurate, just a convenient interpretation of events.
The thing is that they were prepared to sign Bolland to close to that. He just chose the richer offer from the Panthers. Doesn't really inspire much faith.
The thing is that they were prepared to sign Bolland to close to that. He just chose the richer offer from the Panthers. Doesn't really inspire much faith.
I know he's older now, but I have a hard time taking anything Gord Stellick says seriously after he traded Russ Courtnall for John Kordic. Sure he was young, put into a tough position by Ballard, but still. He could have gone down the hall and asked a janitor for a second opinion and saved himself some trouble.
Where is this notion that we offered Bolland 5m long-term coming from? Because I keep reading it... I'd believe we offered Bolland 5 mill/1-2 years as it's a low risk signing, but I haven't seen anything to support this or the 5 mill long term deal that seems to keep popping up on these boards...
i wouldn't go that far. i mean he probably thought, "if clarkson can get that type of money, then so can I".
with having said that, who would you guys rather have, clarkson at 5.25M or bolland at 5.5M?
"I think the Leafs are going to go back at it one more time this morning," said TSN's Bob McKenzie during an appearance on the Team 1040 sports talk radio station in Vancouver on Tuesday morning. "They're prepared to give Bolland a five-year deal in the neighborhood of $5 million per year..."
I thought it was a Ballard order, to get someone cheaper.