Largest Single Season Roster

Iron Mike Sharpe

Registered User
Dec 6, 2017
951
1,130
Does anybody have any idea which team dressed the most players in a single season? I'm thinking it's likely a team that lost a much higher than normal number of injuries and call-up replacements, as well as perhaps more players moved in trades. Two related questions: which team had the most trades in a season, and which team lost the most man games to injury in a season?
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
9,606
5,223
Mike Keenan blues was one of the first to come up to mind:


42 skaters, 4 goaltenders for 46 players used, 35 playing more than 10 games, 17 players involved in a trade on that roster I think (from or to St-Louis)
 
Last edited:

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,599
5,254
One that came to mind was the 1989-1990 Quebec Nordiques.

Terrible team that used 42 different skaters + 7 different goals (49 total players). Keep in mind Quebec made (6) in-season trades and claimed (2) players from waivers.
 

Staniowski

Registered User
Jan 13, 2018
3,522
3,093
The Maritimes
The '83 - '84 Penguins dressed 48 players.

In addition to being a terrible team, they must've had a lot of injuries....only 4 players played 70 games and only 3 more played 60 games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iron Mike Sharpe

kaiser matias

Registered User
Mar 22, 2004
4,733
1,882
2008-09 Lightning had a total of 50 players (45 skaters, 5 goalies) play at least 1 game, possibly the largest in the cap era.

I also recall some mention at the time about them using an unusual amount of defencemen as well (22 total), but I don't know where that stands all-time.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
9,606
5,223
1991-1992 Bruins should be the most ever for the skaters at least and with a good margin for the second most.


51 skaters with 4 goaltenders for 55 players that season.

Only 36 of the 51 skaters played 10 games or more too, very similar to the 95-96 Blues in that regards.

Close enough are the
North stars of 87-88 and Tampa bay of 99-2000 with 47 skaters
03-04 Capitals with 46
Insladers of 95-96 with 45

Tampa bay of 2008-2009 mentionned above would be the most with the 2018-2019 Ducks of the cap era with 45 skaters
 
Last edited:

Iron Mike Sharpe

Registered User
Dec 6, 2017
951
1,130
1991-1992 Bruins should be the most ever for the skaters at least and with a good margin for the second most.


51 skaters with 4 goaltenders for 55 players that season.

Only 36 of the 51 skaters played 10 games or more too, very similar to the 95-96 Blues in that regards.

Close enough are the
North stars of 87-88 and Tampa bay of 99-2000 with 47 skaters
03-04 Capitals with 46
Insladers of 95-96 with 45

Tampa bay of 2008-2009 mentionned above would be the most with the 2018-2019 Ducks of the cap era with 45 skaters

Wow, good find! I just checked and at least 28 of them played for the Maine Mariners that season, and the roster count for the Mariners was 49, meaning the two teams carried 76 players between them in order to keep the Bruins supplied with healthy players. This could be the winner, unless somebody can dig up another team with more than 55.

I looked at a handful of other teams at random, and it seems hitting the mid-to-high 40s as a roster count hasn't necessarily been as unusual as we might think. Wondering if any other teams managed to dress 50 or more.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
9,606
5,223

brachyrynchos

Registered User
Apr 10, 2017
1,472
998
2003-04 NY Rangers had 50 players that season, 45 skaters 5 goalies.
1995-96 Isles came close with 49, 4 being goalies.
 

Iron Mike Sharpe

Registered User
Dec 6, 2017
951
1,130
Over 50 thus far:

91-92 Bruins - 55
99-00 Lightning - 53
03-04 Capitals - 51
08-09 Lightning - 50
03-04 Rangers - 50
87-88 North Stars - 50
 
  • Like
Reactions: shadow1

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
13,526
8,143
NYC
www.hockeyprospect.com
Montreal lost 731 man games to injury this past year. That's going to be tough to beat.

Now, whether that's the record for most impactful players, I can't say...

Probably a tough database query to join, but maybe using ice time from the previous season, one could imperfectly determine a proxy of "most impact man games lost" in a year...

Cumulatively, Pittsburgh is/was a big injury prone team. They're certainly the most-accomplished-despite-injury team this side of the lockout.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Iron Mike Sharpe

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,599
5,254
Montreal lost 731 man games to injury this past year. That's going to be tough to beat.

Now, whether that's the record for most impactful players, I can't say...

Probably a tough database query to join, but maybe using ice time from the previous season, one could imperfectly determine a proxy of "most impact man games lost" in a year...

Cumulatively, Pittsburgh is/was a big injury prone team. They're certainly the most-accomplished-despite-injury team this side of the lockout.



I read that Montreal indeed has the record. Previously it was the 2003-2004 LA Kings, with 629 man games lost.

Arizona almost broke this record in 2021-2022 as well, with 627 man games lost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iron Mike Sharpe

NHLInjuryViz

Registered User
Feb 12, 2020
145
212
Can’t vouch for it…but apparently there’s a bunch of injury data (including various weighted man-games lost measures) at this place:

Index

Can’t answer the question about the most players used in a season but you’ll find injury totals for each team back to 2000/01 there.

FWIW I still had last year’s Habs below the 03/04 Kings’ MGL “record” (which isn’t any sort of official record anyway), as I was counting Weber as retired and excluded a stack of games missed by two players on Season Opening IR that really weren’t ever going to be on the roster.
 

Iron Mike Sharpe

Registered User
Dec 6, 2017
951
1,130
Thanks for adding insight & resources, fellas. The injury viz is an interesting resource. Also found this thread speculating on most trades: Most trades a team made in one season

It would be interesting to see a season by season tracking of roster turnover (which includes trades, signings, prospect promotions, retirements, releases, etc) and data map that against man games lost to see if there are any statistical correlations over time that measure the impact of the number of players dressed to team success. Obviously the quality/importance of a player in a turnover or games lost situation has a deeper impact, but I wonder if anything can be gleaned by looking at raw data in terms of number of roster players used per season.

It looks like the Habs dressed 46 players last year.
 

The Panther

Registered User
Mar 25, 2014
19,266
15,863
Tokyo, Japan
Looks like the Oilers hit 49 in 2013-14, which was in some ways the seasonal-nadir of the franchise.

There's obviously a correlation here between (a) lots of injuries and (b) suckage.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad