- Jul 5, 2015
- 13,952
- 11,800
Good, let him rest.
Kupari I hope.So then who is centering the top line.
Kupari I hope.So then who is centering the top line.
I am actually not opposed to that idea. There is something about his play that oozes potential and I think it is a worthy experiment to have him with Ehlers and Connor. I normally would not think that is wise but in his case I think there are multiple potential benefitsI'd just like to take a look at Kup with some more talented players.
Not the sort of invocation that one normally expects to see on here.Toninato and AJF is my guess for waivers
But thank god Morrissey nuts are ok
Either am I - nothing to lose really and it would be interesting to seeI am actually not opposed to that idea. There is something about his play that oozes potential and I think it is a worthy experiment to have him with Ehlers and Connor. I normally would not think that is wise but in his case I think there are multiple potential benefits
Really? I routinely thank god that my nuts are still ok.Not the sort of invocation that one normally expects to see on here.
In the AHL they now kick the goalie out of the game as well as give a penalty shot; the NHL just calls it an automatic goal if it happens on a breakaway. Crybabies
A two-man penalty shot would be a hell of a thing to see. Throw out two pucks as well, goalie's gotta stop 'em both
So it wasn’t “Solely on Pionk”, which is what make you sound bias.
Ehlers saw Matthews and let him go by him to the net with just a little Patrick Liane waive of the stick.You can’t do that. it’s Not a stretch. You can’t ignore the leagues #1 goal scorer and allow him to go anywhere he want unchecked in OT. that’s what happened. Make as many domino excuses as you want for Ehlers, it was a bad look. I’m not saying it was “solely on Ehlers”, but for a guy who is constantly given credit as great defensively because of the spread sheets it was awful effort.
I have no doubt in my mind he would have turned On the Jets if there was a turn over and he was on offense.
I've always frowned upon most of the terminology. Nuts and Junk and Eggs and all sorts of strange names seem so disrespectful, even when I slip into the same shorthand. I mean, testicles are amazing things when you look at what they do and how vulnerable they are. Granted, I don't own a set, despite several suggestions online that I "grow a pair", so I don't have the dismissive familiarity that boys do. But still.Really? I routinely thank god that my nuts are still ok.
I've always frowned upon most of the terminology.
James and the giant peaches?I've always frowned upon most of the terminology. Nuts and Junk and Eggs and all sorts of strange names seem so disrespectful, even when I slip into the same shorthand. I mean, testicles are amazing things when you look at what they do and how vulnerable they are. Granted, I don't own a set, despite several suggestions online that I "grow a pair", so I don't have the dismissive familiarity that boys do. But still.
Okay, even I'm starting to see how ridiculous I sound so that's the end of this discussion from me.
I mean, testicles are amazing things when you look at what they do and how vulnerable they are. Granted, I don't own a set, despite several suggestions online that I "grow a pair", so I don't have the dismissive familiarity that boys do. But still.
Not surprised that Scheifele is not ready to go, it's a delicate injury and another week + should ready help. As for Joshua and Vilardi and it is Vilardi not Vivaldi CC, I think both will play.
Twig and berries?Called it.
James and the giant peaches?
You don't have a pair hanging from the rear view mirror of your car, like a trophy?I've always frowned upon most of the terminology. Nuts and Junk and Eggs and all sorts of strange names seem so disrespectful, even when I slip into the same shorthand. I mean, testicles are amazing things when you look at what they do and how vulnerable they are. Granted, I don't own a set, despite several suggestions online that I "grow a pair", so I don't have the dismissive familiarity that boys do. But still.
Okay, even I'm starting to see how ridiculous I sound so that's the end of this discussion from me.
Get him out there with him to maybe get him a goal and "pop his cherry" as it were, and maybe thefloodgates will open.I am actually not opposed to that idea. There is something about his play that oozes potential and I think it is a worthy experiment to have him with Ehlers and Connor. I normally would not think that is wise but in his case I think there are multiple potential benefits
But hockey insider and know-it-all said Schief would play.....not as much an insider as we're led to believe there Darren!So then who is centering the top line.
2 pucks. Literally loled.
Kupari at 1-C would allow us to see if there is a racehorse in the guy..fast linemates for him could be crazy wild to watch..I am actually not opposed to that idea. There is something about his play that oozes potential and I think it is a worthy experiment to have him with Ehlers and Connor. I normally would not think that is wise but in his case I think there are multiple potential benefits
Just a 2C away, the jets are lost without a 2C , Chevy rescue them before they fall into 5th place...2 C or not to 2 C, that is the question!