Goal Caufield50
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2007
- 853
- 282
I’d ask for a 5th this year and a 3rd next yearWith 3 x 3rd round pick in 2022, I would ask for a 3rd in 2023
Is there a link to this rumour?Discuss : What would Kulak cost? A third?
An inexpensive stop gap D to fill in until some kids are ready.
A 3rd for an experienced NHL D is not good personel management. I keep Kulak
I’ll be honest, I prefer Schu man over Kulak.An inexpensive stop gap D to fill in until some kids are ready.
A 3rd for an experienced NHL D is not good personel management. I keep Kulak
You have Harris penciled in when we don't even know if he signs or is good enough. You need veteran depth.I’ll be honest, I prefer Schu man over Kulak.
LHD
SCHU
Edmundson
Harris
Romanov
He’s a UFA so if you really need him sign him on UFA day
Edmundson and Romanov is decent veteran presence.You have Harris penciled in when we don't even know if he signs or is good enough. You need veteran depth.
Tsn countdown to trade centreIs there a link to this rumour?
Romanov is not veteran presence at all. A good player, but not a veteran and definitely not a leader at this point.Edmundson and Romanov is decent veteran presence.
Harris will sign, and we also have Wideman
Kulak goes IMO (as long as Petry is still a Hab)
Plays like a young veteran, has been solid since St-Louis has come in…..very dependableRomanov is not veteran presence at all. A good player, but not a veteran and definitely not a leader at this point.
He will miss the playoffs and consequently get sacked!!!It will be pathetic if Holland's playoff push goes no further than trading a third.
Romanov is no veteran at this pointRomanov is not veteran presence at all. A good player, but not a veteran and definitely not a leader at this point.
Want us to retain? A 2nd. No retain a 3rd. He's a decent defenseman. If move Kulak need to replace from Laval. Want Laval good playoff run. Good for player developmentDiscuss : What would Kulak cost? A third?
To be honest, I think the Habs might value him with us vs adding a 3rd rounder which we have lots of. Basically, if you trade Kulak, you have to sign someone to replace him and the 3rd rounder is a shot at a grade B prospect?
Something tells me that Hughes would only move him for a 2nd. Otherwise, they have plans to keep him around during the rebuild years. Not sure it's worth moving him for a 3rd rounder. Unless he wants a raise which I doubt cause he's more of a journeyman 3rd pairing guy now.
Even if others move him to a depth role, there is still value in keeping him around due to injuries. 6 D plus 2 extra is the usual norm.
You have Harris penciled in when we don't even know if he signs or is good enough. You need veteran depth.