CBJWerenski8
Formerly CBJWennberg10 (RIP Kivi)
- Jun 13, 2009
- 42,337
- 24,261
I think Kukan has shown he can play higher in the pairings. I still get goose bumps thinking about that goal he blasted past Rask in Game 5 of the Bruins series last season.Glad to see Kukan in the fold. I like his game, which I think has room to grow despite his age. Solid bottom pair guy who looks competent on the rare PP chances he gets.
Before seeing your name, I thought for sure this was a @Johansen2Foligno post.Now we're Kukan!
I don't totally understand Jarmo's strategy. Our blue line is already crowded and continues to be with these signings. Have to think a trade is in the offing. I mean, Peeke has shown he can play and will likely earn a spot in the next two years, if not earlier. But...now we have 8 blue liners on one-way deals + Peeke. Harrington and Murray have no trade value. Z and Jones aren't getting traded. So we're probably looking at moving Savard or Nutivaara either at the TDL or this summer.
I have to agree about maybe a trade coming. It may even include Kukan.I don't totally understand Jarmo's strategy. Our blue line is already crowded and continues to be with these signings. Have to think a trade is in the offing. I mean, Peeke has shown he can play and will likely earn a spot in the next two years, if not earlier. But...now we have 8 blue liners on one-way deals + Peeke. Harrington and Murray have no trade value. Z and Jones aren't getting traded. So we're probably looking at moving Savard or Nutivaara either at the TDL or this summer.
I don't totally understand Jarmo's strategy. Our blue line is already crowded and continues to be with these signings. Have to think a trade is in the offing. I mean, Peeke has shown he can play and will likely earn a spot in the next two years, if not earlier. But...now we have 8 blue liners on one-way deals + Peeke. Harrington and Murray have no trade value. Z and Jones aren't getting traded. So we're probably looking at moving Savard or Nutivaara either at the TDL or this summer.
Savard is pretty important as a RHD and is well liked off the ice (especially by Dubois and Werenski). I think he is in the fold long term.I don't totally understand Jarmo's strategy. Our blue line is already crowded and continues to be with these signings. Have to think a trade is in the offing. I mean, Peeke has shown he can play and will likely earn a spot in the next two years, if not earlier. But...now we have 8 blue liners on one-way deals + Peeke. Harrington and Murray have no trade value. Z and Jones aren't getting traded. So we're probably looking at moving Savard or Nutivaara either at the TDL or this summer.
Savard is pretty important as a RHD and is well liked off the ice (especially by Dubois and Werenski). I think he is in the fold long term.
One other thing to keep in mind will be the effect that the expansion draft has. I believe Gavrikov is exempt.
you can keep 8 blue liners... it's not like its an issue. just bench some. trade harry for future consideration to a teem that need a 7th going in the playoff at worse. no need to trade Savy or nutiI don't totally understand Jarmo's strategy. Our blue line is already crowded and continues to be with these signings. Have to think a trade is in the offing. I mean, Peeke has shown he can play and will likely earn a spot in the next two years, if not earlier. But...now we have 8 blue liners on one-way deals + Peeke. Harrington and Murray have no trade value. Z and Jones aren't getting traded. So we're probably looking at moving Savard or Nutivaara either at the TDL or this summer.
what do they need his roster spot for ? to rush peeke ? I still think he has more value than that anyway.In my mind I have already moved on from Murray. Put him on the trading block leading up to the draft and get the best deal you can even if its just a 4th rounder. Would anyone be OK with CBJ paying half his salary for one season for a 2nd rounder? We kinda need his roster spot more than we need him.
Because we have seven even without Peeke: Jones, Z, Savard, Gavrikov, Nuti, Kukan and Harry. Then we have Peeker and Clendenning in Cleveland. We need his roster spot so we can carry an extra offensive player...not so we can keep an extra d-man.what do they need his roster spot for ? to rush peeke ? I still think he has more value than that anyway.
it's convenient but it's not like a necessityBecause we have seven even without Peeke: Jones, Z, Savard, Gavrikov, Nuti, Kukan and Harry. Then we have Peeker and Clendenning in Cleveland. We need his roster spot so we can carry an extra offensive player...not so we can keep an extra d-man.
Because we have seven even without Peeke: Jones, Z, Savard, Gavrikov, Nuti, Kukan and Harry. Then we have Peeker and Clendenning in Cleveland. We need his roster spot so we can carry an extra offensive player...not so we can keep an extra d-man.
Yup, that's the emoticon all fans have been using regarding Murray for the last few years.Murray?