At age of Kotkaniemi, Pettersson play in SHL lol. Kotkaniemi is Barkov 2.0. Barkov > Pettersson
I think the word you're looking for is dominated.
Pettersson started in the NHL at 19 not 20Kotkaniemi at 18 is pretty damn great defensively and showing some wicked skills offensively. Pettersson started playing in the NHL at 20. Not the same thing. I'm going for Kotkaniemi.
Not just his speed and vision, literally every aspect of Pettersson's game is a higher level than Kotkaniemi's. Habs fans give me one area of Kotka's game that is better than Pettersson's.Pettersson's speed and vision sets him apart. He'll be flirting with 100 point seasons almost every season, can't say the same for Kotka.
Pettersson won SHL MVP as a 19 year old and he turned 20 one month into the season. Stop trying to push a false narrative. You're spreading false information.Actually, Pettersson started playing in the NHL at 19. This is his draft +2 season.
And he won the SHL MVP as an 18 year old...
He turned 20 in November. If that one month at the start of the season is so important, than we can also say Kotkaniemi got drafted at 17. It really makes no difference.Pettersson started in the NHL at 19 not 20
You didn't make a mistake. He's about two years older (20 months). Pettersson was less then two months away from being eligible for the 2016 draft.My mistake, I thought he was two years older.
Point still stands, though. If you’ve been watching Kotkaniemi, you have to be impressed and interested to see what he’ll do at the same stages.
They are not even playmaking-wise. Petey is clearly a better playmaker.Kotka also played in a pro league at the age of 17. Pettersson didn't do that until his age 19 season. Kotka has the edge on EP defensively and they are even playmaking-wise. In 20 months Kotka will be way closer to EP.
Kotka also played in a pro league at the age of 17. Pettersson didn't do that until his age 19 season. Kotka has the edge on EP defensively and they are even playmaking-wise. In 20 months Kotka will be way closer to EP.
This really makes no sense. For example Pettersson maybe didn't play in the NHL in his D+1, but Hischier did and Nico was far more impressive last year than Kotka is this year.
Now in their d+2 EP has made the jump and is better than Nico (who is still on a great trajectory and constantly improving). Don't see how Kotka can be better than EP and the comparison really makes no sense.
Hischier played 3 minutes more and with Hart trophy winner Taylor Hall. I actually think that Kotkaniemi have been more impressive than Hischier last year.
Answer to this poll is obviously Pettersson. I think he is overhyped by some of the Canucks fans but i think he is going to be top 5 C if not top 3.
LOL. Nico had a D+1 that is comparable to guys like Hall, Stamkos, Tavares, etc, but somehow Kotka is having a more impressive season? Lay off the drugs buddy, because that's one of a the most asinine things I've ever heard.
Point production is not best way to evaluate their seasons because they were in complitely different situations. Nico played with Hart trophy winner and main thing was primary scoring for his team. Kotka is playing with Lehkonen and Armia their main thing is to shut down other lines and give secondary scoring. I think Kotka have looked better than Nico last year and that is with good margin too. I watched like 5-8 games of devils last year. I love how these armchair scouts only stares stats and love to compare them without giving thought what is behind the offensive production.
It tells everything about you getting offensive about hockey forum posts. Maybe you should get some sedatives.
They are not even playmaking-wise. Petey is clearly a better playmaker.
I can easily see Kotkaniemi passing Hischier as a player.