Byfield and Clarke are going now where. Plus the Rangers going with Quick as the starter would not be a good idea. But LA laughs and hangs up
See comments below.
LA hangs up = vulnerability and does not address G issues next 5 yrs.
I agree, long term, By + Clarke should be kept
But Kings situation unique enuf pivot depth, etc, they can chance it
As for Rs
must get By w/Kreider + Zib as bookend Ws
worth it
and yr assessment is wrong
we can juggle our net situation better than anybody thanks to Allaire
This is you solution to bring a #3 to L.A. ?
Normal people would have proposed something like pick up Rantaa for free who makes the exact salary as the injured Copley.
How many years have you been told now that Byfield and Clarke are not available?
You ignore my post #75 quotes 2 posters suggesting it might be smart to think about investing in a more dramatic upgrade.
If you don't want Shesty, play the hand y0ou have and watch while Talbot will do a good job and can mostly handle starter mins [barring injury], he's gonna need quality, legit relief which isn't available, esp cheap
w'o cheap, quality, legit relief the only alternative, besides do nothing and accept negative result is go outside the box
I usually advocate vs all in moves and prefer build moves, which is what Rs would be doing here
LA is doing well, needs a G solution next 5-ish yrs, and all that in mind, Shesty makes sense
Sorry you don't agree b'c high price, but the above is correct, like it or not