Keep Calm and Cleary On... I can't believe this thread is still needed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

ArGarBarGar

What do we want!? Unfair!
Sep 8, 2008
44,038
11,732
Well, you don't have to be Nostradamus to figure this one out. Kronwall-Smith-DD-Ericsson are the core of our defence for the next 5 years. That leaves only 2 spots, assuming no trades or FA signings.

It also assumes that all 4 will be good enough to be bona fide NHL defencemen (and since Wings fans minimum standard for "NHL defencemen" prime Lidstrom, good luck with that).

It's why I'm all for packaging one or more of them for some top talent if and when it becomes available - they can't, and won't, all play.


I wouldn't necessarily put Smith in there. The guy hasn't really been treated like he is a part of the core, so I could see him being moved if Babcock continues to keep him off the powerplay.
 

WingedWheel1987

Registered User
Jan 11, 2011
13,341
921
GPP Michigan
I have to believe Smith is gonna get PP time this season. He has shown that he is very capable of generating scoring opportunities or throwing the opposing defenses off their toes.

I always assumed Babcock wanted Smith to understand that being useful on the PP doesn't make up for poor ES play. It's gonna be a big season for Smith's development. I still think he can meet the expectations laid out by management before he was brought up.
 

Bench

3 is a good start
Aug 14, 2011
21,244
15,034
crease
I should have known when the Cleary thread was getting bumped constantly it was actually about Franzen.
 

YostisHome

Wet Bandits
May 7, 2010
1,423
0
Still this overreacting is so hilarious.

A) Cleary has not signed yet
B) Holland is MAYBE offering 2-way deal for him, that will force him to AHL
C) IF the offer will come, it will be a long way to accept that.
D) IF he will accept that, he would not neccessarily still see a single game in NHL.

Why is it even an issue? The guy is a complete liability and no longer can play. Let it go already....the fact that his name is even suggested as returning in any form or fashion is a true indictment of Kenneth Holland.
 

ArGarBarGar

What do we want!? Unfair!
Sep 8, 2008
44,038
11,732
Why is it even an issue? The guy is a complete liability and no longer can play. Let it go already....the fact that his name is even suggested as returning in any form or fashion is a true indictment of Kenneth Holland.

Assuming Ken Holland is considering him in a Wings uniform, sure.
 

AD1066

Registered User
Sep 30, 2011
7,618
3,899
Why is it even an issue? The guy is a complete liability and no longer can play. Let it go already....the fact that his name is even suggested as returning in any form or fashion is a true indictment of Kenneth Holland.

If he ends up mentoring some of the young guys in the AHL, it's not problem at all.

Without anything concrete at this point, there's nothing that would serve as an indictment of Holland.

(And I say that as someone who is not happy with Holland's performance these past few years)
 

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
31,215
12,208
Tampere, Finland
Why is it even an issue? The guy is a complete liability and no longer can play. Let it go already....the fact that his name is even suggested as returning in any form or fashion is a true indictment of Kenneth Holland.

What makes a difference between Cleary and some other AHL veteran they are gonna sign to mentor those kids at Griffins?

That ultimate hate makes people crazy and blind for realism in here.
 

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,246
14,755
What makes a difference between Cleary and some other AHL veteran they are gonna sign to mentor those kids at Griffins?

That ultimate hate makes people crazy and blind for realism in here.

Babcock does not have a personal relationship with anyone else that is going to be in the AHL mentoring Griffins. So no one else has the looming possibility of getting called up while down there.

Huge difference. Unless there's not a bigger fan of Triston Grant and Jeff Hoggan than Babcock too ;)
 

cjm502

Bingo Bango!
Jun 22, 2010
1,791
992
Mid Michigan
I just dont want Cleary going to the Griffs and all the kids thinking "all it takes to be an NHL player is to be a little better than this guy because he has been a career NHL player"
 

YostisHome

Wet Bandits
May 7, 2010
1,423
0
What makes a difference between Cleary and some other AHL veteran they are gonna sign to mentor those kids at Griffins?

That ultimate hate makes people crazy and blind for realism in here.

....and when he strings together a few decent games in GR coupled with the Big Club not being "heavy" for a night or two the plague will return.
 

Outl4w

Registered User
Dec 16, 2011
3,588
2,064
FL
I really hope they do not bring Dan Cleary anywhere near the NHL. If he wants to be an AHLER and help prepare kids for the pros that would be great, but he is no longer an NHLER PERIOD.
 

Bench

3 is a good start
Aug 14, 2011
21,244
15,034
crease
I just dont want Cleary going to the Griffs and all the kids thinking "all it takes to be an NHL player is to be a little better than this guy because he has been a career NHL player"

Cleary has 385 career points and 52 playoff points.

I know it's en vogue to slash Cleary's tires, but most of those kids are going to be lucky to sniff anywhere near that.
 

Crymson

Fire Holland
May 23, 2010
3,667
0
What makes a difference between Cleary and some other AHL veteran they are gonna sign to mentor those kids at Griffins?

That ultimate hate makes people crazy and blind for realism in here.

I want him gone. Gone, gone, gone. He doesn't deserve to be hitting the ice for this organization, PERIOD. Even before his knee went south, he was terrible at everything that goes into playing hockey. He can't skate, can't shoot, can't pass, can't receive passes, can't keep his balance, and so on. His body is broken and he needs to accept that; more importantly, Ken Holland needs to accept that.
 

AD1066

Registered User
Sep 30, 2011
7,618
3,899
I want him gone. Gone, gone, gone. He doesn't deserve to be hitting the ice for this organization, PERIOD. Even before his knee went south, he was terrible at everything that goes into playing hockey. He can't skate, can't shoot, can't pass, can't receive passes, can't keep his balance, and so on. His body is broken and he needs to accept that; more importantly, Ken Holland needs to accept that.

Yeah, like you said it's Holland that's primarily responsible for whatever happens going forward.

I can only imagine being in Cleary's shoes, how difficult it must be to walk away from a life's worth of work and an organization and city that you love, because your body gave out before your heart did.

It's frustrating to watch as a fan, and even cost us points in the standings last season, but I do feel for him in a way. I know he's a millionaire and all, but if he's not living under a rock, it's probably painful seeing many of your own fans turn against you.

That's why I hope he can end up in the AHL or front office if that's what he chooses to do. I think we owe him that much for the effort he's given us. And it certainly can't hurt our organizational reputation to make room for him in either capacity.
 

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
31,215
12,208
Tampere, Finland
I want him gone. Gone, gone, gone. He doesn't deserve to be hitting the ice for this organization, PERIOD. Even before his knee went south, he was terrible at everything that goes into playing hockey. He can't skate, can't shoot, can't pass, can't receive passes, can't keep his balance, and so on. His body is broken and he needs to accept that; more importantly, Ken Holland needs to accept that.

Naah, if you would have seen Jeff Hoggan in NHL for last three years, you would think the same about him.

Just get real, watch some AHL, and understand the difference between these two leagues.

If there's nothing wrong in Jeff Hoggan mentoring our kids, why would Cleary be a problem?

Our organization has praised this guy about his leadership abilities, and I think they know Cleary million times better as a person than anyone in here.
 

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,246
14,755
Naah, if you would have seen Jeff Hoggan in NHL for last three years, you would think the same about him.

Just get real, watch some AHL, and understand the difference between these two leagues.

If there's nothing wrong in Jeff Hoggan mentoring our kids, why would Cleary be a problem?

Our organization has praised this guy about his leadership abilities, and I think they know Cleary million times better as a person than anyone in here.

You quoted the wrong person.
 
Last edited:

Vladdy84

L-O-Y-A-L-T-Y
Dec 1, 2011
10,675
12
Farmington
"It's an opportunity to see what's out there. It's an opportunity to sell your program." -- Ken Holland

Holland said he'll resume talks with Cleary after July 1, after exploring the market and trade possibilities. The Red Wings are likely to fulfill the promise they made Cleary in September by signing him to an extension.

Doomed. Like someone jokingly said a couple days ago. Now that they re-signed Monster. Just gotta sign Cleary (And Quincey) and we're good to go!
 

Crymson

Fire Holland
May 23, 2010
3,667
0
It's unfathomable to me why Holland would make such an unprecedented agreement with a player who was not AT ALL vital to his team and was very obviously in decline. He effectively promised to sign Cleary to an extension regardless of how well he played. That was mind-bogglingly idiotic, almost unforgivably so.

If Holland intends to keep that promise, then he needs to do so in a way that accommodates what's best for the team. That means a two-way contract, it means requiring the guy to earn a roster spot without any bias, it means dumping him in the AHL from the start if he doesn't, and it means lining him up for an NHL call-up based purely on his merit in the AHL or lack thereof---not based on seniority. This is literally the only way in which re-signing this plainly undeserving individual will not have a deleterious impact upon the organization.

But goodness, gracious... why on Earth did he make such an patently stupid promise to a player? And why to Dan Cleary, of all people?
 

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,246
14,755
It's unfathomable to me why Holland would make such an unprecedented agreement with a player who was not AT ALL vital to his team and was very obviously in decline. He effectively promised to sign Cleary to an extension regardless of how well he played. That was mind-bogglingly idiotic, almost unforgivably so.

If Holland intends to keep that promise, then he needs to do so in a way that accommodates what's best for the team. That means a two-way contract, it means requiring the guy to earn a roster spot without any bias, it means dumping him in the AHL from the start if he doesn't, and it means lining him up for an NHL call-up based purely on his merit in the AHL or lack thereof---not based on seniority. This is literally the only way in which re-signing this plainly undeserving individual will not have a deleterious impact upon the organization.

But goodness, gracious... why on Earth did he make such an patently stupid promise to a player? And why to Dan Cleary, of all people?

This organization can't do anything "without bias" when it comes to Dan Cleary. Literally nothing.
 

detredWINgs

Registered User
Jan 1, 2004
17,966
0
Michigan
Visit site
It's unfathomable to me why Holland would make such an unprecedented agreement with a player who was not AT ALL vital to his team and was very obviously in decline. He effectively promised to sign Cleary to an extension regardless of how well he played. That was mind-bogglingly idiotic, almost unforgivably so.

If Holland intends to keep that promise, then he needs to do so in a way that accommodates what's best for the team. That means a two-way contract, it means requiring the guy to earn a roster spot without any bias, it means dumping him in the AHL from the start if he doesn't, and it means lining him up for an NHL call-up based purely on his merit in the AHL or lack thereof---not based on seniority. This is literally the only way in which re-signing this plainly undeserving individual will not have a deleterious impact upon the organization.

But goodness, gracious... why on Earth did he make such an patently stupid promise to a player? And why to Dan Cleary, of all people?

Let's back up a bit: Why does Holland even need to make this kind of promise in the first place? Is this greater evidence of how Holland negotiates generally with veterans? Was he so flustered by the fact that Cleary had a tryout offer from one other NHL team, he needed to add a pinky swear promise about re-upping Cleary in order to secure his return to the team?

I'm not really worried about what happens with Cleary next year, as I think the worst-case scenario is that he gets Maltby'd, but I am worried about how hard it is for Ken Holland to break ties with long-time players.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad