Quinn has had a positive effect on every young player we've had outside of Lias and at this point i think its obvious where the blame lies there as he hasn't done jack with L.A. either. Kakko had no idea how to play north american hockey, i knew it was going to be a problem when i saw that wrap around goal before the season started and how he mentioned his coach told him to not pass the puck....he was out of his element here, the guy that started that season and the guy thay started last season were worlds apart. I'm happy we got Gallant, but Quinn helped develop these players, guys like Lindgren, Chytil, Laf and Kakko are all better then when they started here by a lot.
I don't think you can just say "NA hockey". Kakko is looking for a more complete game from his line mates.
He stood out like a sore thumb even last season, not because of lack of talent, but because his approach was so different to many of the others.
If you had plopped him down in say Colorado, Florida, Carolina, maybe even Vegas he'd have fitted in much better.
To me the best line, as in a unit of three forwards, the Rangers had last season was Kreider-Chytil-Kakko. Kreider's back issues meant we didn't see it much, but that line was the only line playing the style of hockey I expect to see under Gallant, capable of grinding the boards and cycling the puck. Laf-Zib-Buch was also good, but they broke that line up with the Buch trade.
The addition of Gallant should be a huge boost for Kakko and hopefully others like Chytil.