Fabbro, Wilson and a 2nd for JVR and Bozak.
JVR is not worth that much, and Nashville needs centers more than a winger
If that's the case switch Fabbro to CarrierSwitch the second to a 1st and it's a deal
If that's the case switch Fabbro to Carrier
I'd even retain a little if need be.
I think people are really underestimating what JVR could haul the Leafs. Shattenkirk got the Blues a 1st,2nd and two players. Vancouver got Dahlen for Burrows. The Leafs gave up a 2nd for a fourth line center. A first(probably late too) and a middling prospect for a legit first line winger? C'mon. This is why outside observers see HF as out of touch.
I'd be fine with that deal.The 1st round pick in 18 is the most important piece to me.
I don't want to disrupt Nashville's core.
The trade should also help them with the loss of Neal as they are looking for a Cup.
I'm fine with a "B" prospect, someone who can grow into a solid NHL player, cost controlled with years of RFA status. Then the 1st. That will give the Leafs 2 1sts in 18, plus the prospect.
That's the deal I'm looking for from any team interested.
Jvrs value is more than a first. If we can't move jvr for a dman or package we like including a dman we will keep him simple as that. We will resign him and wait on offers until there's any real urgency to move him
I'd be fine with that deal.
I don't consider Fabbro a "b" prospect though. So the poster asking for last years 1st round pick, and next years first round pick along with Wilson, IMHO is asking too much.
no thanks, not interested in resigning JVR. 1st + I agree with we should get that. Im not putting a strain on our cap structure to resign JVR and hope we can trade him. He is just not a core piece or really even a needed piece in our lineup. He would be worth signing if your team needs scoring he just isn't worth it to the leafs
I don't consider Arvidsson a top line winger just yet, his sample size is too small, so there goes that argument.
In terms of Forsberg and Van-Riemsdyk:
Zone adjusted 5 on 5 points per 60 from 2014-2017:
Forsberg: 2.22
JVR: 1.96
Forsberg has clearly been the more superior player 5 on 5, and JVR outscored Forsberg 5 on 5 this season. Yes we should take present players, but the same time, who knows if this season wasn't just JVR's career year? While Forsberg can still grow. Not to mention Forsberg is a great defensive winger, while JVR is average in that department at best (PK=/=defense).
Now for corsi (5on5 ZS.Adj):
Stats|Forsberg|JVR
CF60RelTM| 6.02 |2.51
CA60RelTM| -1.65 |4.84
CF%RelTM| 3.2 |-0.9
Actual corsi stats is not as relevant to the discussion, so I'll just use adjusted.
I might have underrated JVR, but at best he's a mid tier 1st line winger, and that's with his current season. Just 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, I'd consider him a below average 1st line winger, maybe even great 2nd line winger.
And no point bringing up eye test, since that's very biased. But because Leaf fans tend to be very biased, I'll go with Forsberg actually could be a better finisher, and needs to improve on that. JVR finishes better than you'd expect, meaning if Forsberg had JVR's finishing level, he'd have even more points.
I'm not so sure the fans mind trading Fabbro, I think it would be more Poile that wouldn't really want to. Something most of us tend to forget is that in roughly 2 years the D will start all needing new contracts and they certainly won't be as cheap as they are now. So in a couple of years a guy like Fabbro could be needed just for a cost containment stand point assuming he is good enough.
It actually makes me wonder if that's why we haven't seen Poile get deals done is because he doesn't want to let Fabbro go, but obviously that's just speculation on my part.