Hockey Stick
Registered User
- Jan 3, 2018
- 1,406
- 1,177
lol yeahWhy trade the younger 1 when u can trade a older 1 whos better and have better value
smh habs fan
Why trade the younger 1 when u can trade a older 1 whos better and have better value
smh habs fan
How would habs fans think about Chychrun
I don’t watch a lot of Arizona but has he been that bad this year that you’d move him for a guy like Juulsen?
How would habs fans think about Chychrun
Not even close lol. Lindell has played top pairing for 2 years now and is currently showing he can do so without klingberg. He isnt moving and if he did it would be for a lot more than thatEsa Lindell if Montreal adds something to Juulsen?
Josh Mahura?
Juulsen for Sergachev
i very rarely bash the habs, Gallagher Petry Mete Kotkaniemi Byron Tatar are all among my favorite players.
However, Juulsen has a terrible 44.8 xGF% since the start of last season, and Dermott has a great 55.52. Not to mention Juulsen only having 3 5v5 primary points in that span. hes really not good right now. he has some potential sure but Dermott has thus far been WAY better at the NHL level.
i very rarely bash the habs, Gallagher Petry Mete Kotkaniemi Byron Tatar are all among my favorite players.
However, Juulsen has a terrible 44.8 xGF% since the start of last season, and Dermott has a great 55.52. Not to mention Juulsen only having 3 5v5 primary points in that span. hes really not good right now. he has some potential sure but Dermott has thus far been WAY better at the NHL level.
dermott also got a super low qot in that span btw. he was also not playing with top talent. i would easily take both of dermott and mete over juulsen. i get that its a small sample for both of them but when the difference is that drastic...I didn't watch both players analytics numbers but Juulsen only played 40 games in both season combined... I wouldn't put too much weight on stats until he has 100+ games at least. Also, 23 of those games were last year and the habs were putrid. He was also playing with Karl ''dead weight'' Alzner most of the time.
Dermott has been brought up much smoother. If you actually watched Juulsen this year, you wooth ould know he was dominant in camp/pre-season, had a good first 10 games and then slowed down 3-4 games to come backt o form for his last 2-3 games before getting injured. I think a good comparable for Juulsen, potential/style wise, would be Josh Manson from Anaheim. I think Dermott is going to be a good top 4 very soon, but I doubt he has the off. ability to become a top pairing D, a little bit like Victor Mete. I could make a comparable between Dermott and maybe a mix of Martinez/Spurgeon... Personnally I prefer having a guy like Juulsen on my second pairing in terms of physical/defensive play.
I like Chychrun, but I don't love his new contract with his injury history. Pass.
dermott also got a super low qot in that span btw. he was also not playing with top talent. i would easily take both of dermott and mete over juulsen. i get that its a small sample for both of them but when the difference is that drastic...
juulsen has nowhere near the offense of manson
Development isn’t linear. Manson has turned into a phenomenal offensive defenseman at the NHL level and there is no evidence for Juulsen doing the sameI don't think you know what you're talking about... I suggest you watch some games. Manson was barely an nhl player at 21 and had a 10pts high season in the NCAA.
There are evidence you don't watch games and only look at stats... I don't think Manson is a phenomenal offensive defenseman and I don't think Juulsen has the potential to be one either.Development isn’t linear. Manson has turned into a phenomenal offensive defenseman at the NHL level and there is no evidence for Juulsen doing the same
Whatever you think is wrong. I can confirm that Dom does indeed watch the games.There are evidence you don't watch games and only look at stats... I don't think Manson is a phenomenal offensive defenseman and I don't think Juulsen has the potential to be one either.