I rather trade Leddy at this years deadline. If he has a bounce back year his value will be pretty high. He is a very steady player but his lack of offensive game last season left plenty to be desired.Leddy would bring back more.
I don't see why NYI fans are in a hurry to get rid of him - he is still solid. Mayfield will yield the largest return, but not sure other GMs are sold on him being a top-4 guy.
Boychuk has arguably the most underrated bad deal in the NHL. He’s like a #5 at this point, signed until 38, at 6 per. The only good news is his NMC just turned into a NTC. I could see a team asking for a pretty high end prospect to take his contract.
Why did you make this thread? Boychuk is a heart and soul guy, and a warrior on the ice.With Scott mayfield taking the next step to be a legitimate top 4 dman (with a phenomenal contract), pulock quickly developing into a top pairing dman, and Dobson doing absolutely everything he can to prove he should be playing in the nhl next season what would the isles be able to get for this warrior of a number 4/5 right hand defensive dman
Unless they can trade hickey and boychuk gets demoted to rotating 6/7 with Dobson
Didn't realize Boychuk was as old as he is, 1984 birth year.
Good luck trying to move him with that contract.
He hasn't really played that many NHL games in relation to his age . There are far worse contracts out there . May I ask if you have seen him play ? He does not hurt this team. Now the Looch deal is a lead anchor for what he brings on ice and not anywhere in the same " bad contract " conversation as JB.
There are 5 dmen from the 2002 draft still playing . Trevor Daley has 350 more games played . Jonathan Ericcson 1 more game .
Think of it like this. If he was a Free Agent, would you want the Fish to give him 6M AAV over 3 years? Most definitely not, nor would any team. Not sure why you're bringing up Lucic, I never mentioned him. Lucic has nother year on his deal and his contract is a lot more buyout proof, so that contributes to it and not just the impact they provide on the ice.
Boychuck is probably between an average and replacement level dman at this point, closer to average but below average. His transition game was never good but it's completely gone, he's a chip off glass guy who provides slightly negative to neutral value depending on the stretch he's on.
That's just simply terrible value for 6M. With what he is at this poin, you can find a player like him for league minimum to a 1.5M in any given offseason IMO.
Why did you make this thread? Boychuk is a heart and soul guy, and a warrior on the ice.
It would be good for the isles and for Dobson to be brought into the nhl to prevent his development from being stunted by not being challenged often enoughThis is easy...
- Boychuk is usually outmanned athletically, but is a smart veteran, who is as steadying presence on D.
- His value in a trade is minimal to what he actually provides for them.
- The Isles don't need cap space.
- Even if they did, the deals of Ladd, Clutterbuck, Hickey, etc are bigger problems.
Add it all up and the Isles should keep Boychuk and we should close this thread.
At this point isles are losing 3 forwards to free agency, they were never losing any dmen this free agencyWhy trade Boychuk when he’s proved he can still play the game? Ladd is falling apart and Clutterbuck has a bad back. Both of those forwards are wasting space for someone who can play.
Exactly. .... Consider that Zdeno Chara, is a shell of who he used to be. But he still brings a veteran presence to the team that is sorely missed when he isn't playing. It's the same with Boychuck. Maybe he isn't the hit everything that moves beast of yesteryear but he's still highly effective and provides leadership and presence to our blueline.This is easy...
- Boychuk is usually outmanned athletically, but is a smart veteran, who is as steadying presence on D.
- His value in a trade is minimal to what he actually provides for them.
- The Isles don't need cap space.
- Even if they did, the deals of Ladd, Clutterbuck, Hickey, etc are bigger problems.
Add it all up and the Isles should keep Boychuk and we should close this thread.
didn't seem to hurt Pulock or Toews they had what 5 and 4 years to develop. Dobson has had 1. Frankly you have absolutely no clue of what you're talking about. NONE. ZERO, ZILCH.Dobson
It would be good for the isles and for Dobson to be brought into the nhl to prevent his development from being stunted by not being challenged often enough
Exactly. .... Consider that Zdeno Chara, is a shell of who he used to be. But he still brings a veteran presence to the team that is sorely missed when he isn't playing. It's the same with Boychuck. Maybe he isn't the hit everything that moves beast of yesteryear but he's still highly effective and provides leadership and presence to our blueline.
remember we gave up the fewest goals in the NHL last year and you don't do that without Boychuck.
the only people complaining about the job he does quite frankly are young clueless Islander fans who wish we had more cap space to chase Panarin. But those script kiddies are idiots and know less about hockey than a tree stump..
Great job piferal, telling it like it is. Pulock, Toews, Mayfield, and Pelech have grown much this past year and yes Trotz system was instrumental, but so was having Johnny Boychuck as a steadying influence.
those people looking to move Boychuck don't know their arse from a hole in the ground.. Let Dobson and Wilde and Aho mature at their own pace. We don't need to be listening to the idiots in the peanut gallery
Absolutely. I have no issues with Boychuck as is, let him gradually slide down the lineup as we have better options that are actually ready. Why rush Aho, Dobson, and Wilde until they are physically able to handle the positional demands. It's better for them and it's better for us. It wouldn't surprise me AT ALL, to see Boychuck go in the expansion draft, at that point he'd have I think one year left at 6M? For Seattle who will need to reach the floor anyway..... I could see them taking him as a short term addition didn't Vegas take 13 defensemen?B,bbb-bbu-but he's going to be 38 on the last year of his deal - that is much more important then the fact he is a solid defender now.
Seriously, until Boychuks play deteriorates to the point where he isn't effective, these discussions are asinine.
Still not worth trading Boychuk for a mid-late round pick when he's still useful in a limited roll (or atleast until Dobson is ready). I'd rather see Leddy get moved for offensive help, Aho slide into the 5-6 roll with Mayfield (with Toews moving up) and have Hickey play the roll as the #7. Leave Boychuk to mentor Dobson and teach him the ropes. It'll still leave you with:At this point isles are losing 3 forwards to free agency, they were never losing any dmen this free agency
Dobson will get his minutes when he is ready. Boychuk is not going to be traded, his value exceeds what is seen on the ice. Make one million threads about jettisoning Hickey, though.Dobson
Dobson is readyStill not worth trading Boychuk for a mid-late round pick when he's still useful in a limited roll (or atleast until Dobson is ready). I'd rather see Leddy get moved for offensive help, Aho slide into the 5-6 roll with Mayfield (with Toews moving up) and have Hickey play the roll as the #7. Leave Boychuk to mentor Dobson and teach him the ropes. It'll still leave you with:
Toews - ??? (Boychuk for now until Dobson is ready to play full time in 1-2 years)
Pelech-Pulock
Aho-Mayfield
Hickey (expose him to Seattle and hope they grab him with the pick at the expansion draft).
This is still a solid blueline with not many tweaks being made.
He may be ready but Lou is notorious for keeping prospects in the minors/juniors too long. If he does stay up, it'll be as a 5/6 (with some PP time) until he gets more experience.Dobson is ready